docs: remove derivable/copied content, convert external copies to pointers, fix upstream drift

docs/conventions/permission-rule-hygiene/README.md

@@ -79,10 +79,12 @@ order:
 
 > On entering auto mode, broad allow rules that grant arbitrary code execution are dropped:
 > Blanket `Bash(*)` or `PowerShell(*)`; Wildcarded interpreters like `Bash(python*)`; Package-manager
-> run commands; `Agent` allow rules. Narrow rules like `Bash(npm test)` carry over. Dropped rules are
+> run commands; `Agent` allow rules; `Monitor` allow rules, because Claude Code runs Monitor commands
+> through the shell. Narrow rules like `Bash(npm test)` carry over. Dropped rules are
 > restored when you leave auto mode.
 > — [permission-modes](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/permission-modes#eliminate-prompts-with-auto-mode)
-> ("How the classifier evaluates actions")
+> ("How the classifier evaluates actions"; re-fetched 2026-08-26 — the `Monitor` category was
+> added upstream in v2.1.236, which before then left Monitor allow rules in effect in auto mode)
 
 The [auto-mode configuration reference](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/auto-mode-config#route-all-shell-commands-through-the-classifier)
 restates it and adds that `autoMode.classifyAllShell: true` suspends even the narrow shell allow rules:

docs/topics/fable-field-guide-audit/disposition-review.md

@@ -185,9 +185,9 @@ therefore a two-site edit with operative text at both, not one line plus a point
   Row 12 verified against `trust-and-authority.md:56-60`, an authorization gate with no
   comprehension component, as asserted.
 - **Row-level completeness of §6** — spot-checked against S1, S5, S6, S7, S11, S13; every ledger row
-  survives. The attribution of that property to `coverage-reconcile.md` is loose — that file checks
-  article-line, pattern, quadrant and ledger coverage, not ledger-row survival — but the property
-  holds.
+  survives. The attribution of that property to the audit's coverage-reconcile check (a working
+  file removed after absorption) is loose — that check covered article-line, pattern, quadrant and
+  ledger coverage, not ledger-row survival — but the property holds.
 - **The twelve cost-asymmetry sites** — eleven verify cleanly; `planning.md:51` ("Information gain
   per unit cost sets the order") is an ordering rule and a soft fit.
 - **R15-R17, R19, R20, R24 citations** — `context-economy.md:37`, `execution.md:128`/`:133`,

docs/topics/fable-field-guide-audit/dispositions.md

@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ one root cause appears once as a remediation and many times as evidence. **R13,
 reclassified during synthesis** — as A2 (§7), D1 (§3) and D4 (§3) respectively — so those three
 numbers are absent from §5 by design, not by omission. Every row from every
 ledger survives as a row here, including the no-change ones — collapsing them would discard the
-completeness property `coverage-reconcile.md` established.
+completeness property the audit's coverage-reconcile check established (that working file was
+removed once its conclusion was absorbed here).
 
 Audit-originated findings (not derivable from any article claim) are quarantined in §7 so they
 cannot be laundered into article-derived gaps.