add validation #2
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Lab3ss has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
WalkthroughValidation capabilities were integrated into the resume data model. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ResumeStruct
participant Validator
participant ValidationFns
User->>ResumeStruct: Deserialize or validate Resume
ResumeStruct->>Validator: Call Validate trait
Validator->>ValidationFns: Run custom validators (URL, date, email, etc.)
ValidationFns-->>Validator: Return Ok or Error
Validator-->>ResumeStruct: Validation result
ResumeStruct-->>User: Resume instance or validation errors
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/validation.rs (1)
45-62: Date validation works but has known limitations.The regex pattern validates the basic ISO8601 format but doesn't catch invalid dates like February 30th or month 13. The TODO comments acknowledge these limitations. For a resume application, this level of validation is probably sufficient, but consider using a date parsing library like
chronofor stricter validation if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
Cargo.toml(1 hunks)src/lib.rs(1 hunks)src/resume.rs(2 hunks)src/resume/award.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/basics.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/basics/location.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/basics/profile.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/certificate.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/education.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/project.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/publication.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/volunteer.rs(1 hunks)src/resume/work.rs(1 hunks)src/validation.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (10)
src/resume/basics/location.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (1)
validate_country_code(17-31)
src/resume/award.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (1)
validate_date(45-62)
src/resume/education.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_date(45-62)validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/basics/profile.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (1)
validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/volunteer.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_date(45-62)validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/basics.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_email(33-43)validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/certificate.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_date(45-62)validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/work.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_date(45-62)validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/publication.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_date(45-62)validate_url(6-14)
src/resume/project.rs (1)
src/validation.rs (2)
validate_date(45-62)validate_url(6-14)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Rust
src/validation.rs
[error] 83-87: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 110-114: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 144-148: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 173-177: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 215-219: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 261-265: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 284-288: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
[error] 307-311: Clippy lint 'uninlined_format_args': variables can be used directly in the format! string. See https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
🔇 Additional comments (39)
src/lib.rs (1)
2-2: LGTM! Module declaration is correctly placed.The addition of the
validationmodule declaration properly integrates the validation utilities into the crate's public API, making them available for use in the validation annotations throughout the resume modules.Cargo.toml (1)
7-11: All dependency versions are up-to-date and secure.
- email_address = "0.2.9": latest version, no known vulnerabilities.
- regex = "1.11.1": latest version, unaffected by CVE-2022-24713.
- serde_valid = "1.0.5": latest version, no published advisories.
- url = "2.5.4": latest patched version fixing CVE-2024-12224.
No further changes required.
src/resume.rs (2)
2-2: LGTM! Import added for validation framework.The
serde_valid::Validateimport is necessary for the validation functionality.
30-30: LGTM! Resume struct correctly integrated into validation framework.Adding the
Validatederive to theResumestruct allows validation to cascade through all nested validated structures whenvalidate()is called, maintaining consistency with the overall validation framework.src/resume/award.rs (3)
1-1: LGTM! Correct import for date validation.The import properly references the custom date validation function from the validation module.
3-3: LGTM! Required import for validation framework.
5-5: LGTM! Validation trait correctly added.src/resume/basics/profile.rs (4)
1-1: LGTM! Correct import for URL validation.The import properly references the custom URL validation function from the validation module.
3-3: LGTM! Required import for validation framework.
5-5: LGTM! Validation trait correctly added.
9-10: LGTM! URL validation correctly implemented.The custom validation attribute properly applies URL validation to the optional URL field. The underlying
validate_urlfunction uses the standardurl::Url::parseapproach which correctly validates URLs according to RFC 3986.src/resume/basics/location.rs (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean validation integration.The imports are correctly structured, bringing in the necessary validation function and trait.
5-5: Good addition of Validate trait.The struct now properly derives the Validate trait, enabling validation capabilities while maintaining existing serialization functionality.
12-13: Appropriate validation for country code field.The custom validation correctly targets the country_code field, which will enforce ISO-3166-1 ALPHA-2 format (e.g., "US", "AU", "IN") as implemented in the validation module.
src/resume/publication.rs (3)
1-3: Consistent validation imports and trait usage.The imports follow the established pattern and correctly bring in the necessary validation functions.
5-5: Proper Validate trait derivation.The Publication struct now supports validation while maintaining compatibility with existing serialization behavior.
10-13: Well-targeted validation attributes.The validation attributes are appropriately applied:
release_dateuses date validation for ISO8601 format complianceurluses URL validation for RFC 3986 complianceBoth handle optional fields correctly.
src/resume/volunteer.rs (3)
1-3: Consistent validation setup.The imports and trait usage maintain consistency with the validation framework implementation across other resume modules.
5-5: Proper integration of validation capabilities.The Volunteer struct correctly derives the Validate trait, enabling field-level validation.
9-16: Appropriate validation for temporal and URL fields.The validation attributes are well-applied:
urlfield uses URL validationstart_dateandend_datefields use date validationThis ensures data integrity for volunteer experience entries.
src/resume/certificate.rs (3)
1-3: Consistent validation framework integration.The imports follow the established pattern for integrating validation capabilities.
5-5: Proper Validate trait derivation.The Certificate struct correctly derives the Validate trait for validation support.
8-12: Appropriate validation for certificate fields.The validation attributes correctly target:
datefield for ISO8601 date format validationurlfield for RFC 3986 URL format validationBoth validations handle optional fields appropriately.
src/resume/basics.rs (3)
1-3: Consistent validation imports.The imports correctly bring in email and URL validation functions along with the Validate trait.
11-11: Proper validation trait integration.The Basics struct correctly derives the Validate trait, enabling validation for this core resume component.
15-21: Well-designed validation for basic profile fields.The validation attributes are appropriately applied:
imagefield validated as URL (appropriate for profile image URLs)urlfield uses URL validation for personal website/portfolio linksAll validations handle optional fields correctly.
src/resume/education.rs (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean validation integration.The imports are properly structured and the validation module integration follows the established pattern across the codebase.
5-5: LGTM! Proper validation trait derivation.Adding the
Validatetrait to the derive macro enables runtime validation for the Education struct, consistent with the broader validation framework.
8-8: LGTM! Appropriate field-level validation annotations.The validation annotations are correctly applied:
urlfield usesvalidate_urlfor RFC 3986 URL validationstart_dateandend_datefields usevalidate_datefor ISO8601 date format validationThis ensures data integrity for critical Education fields.
Also applies to: 14-14, 17-17
src/resume/project.rs (3)
1-3: LGTM! Consistent validation integration.The imports follow the established pattern and properly integrate the validation module.
5-5: LGTM! Validation trait properly added.The
Validatetrait derivation enables runtime validation for the Project struct, maintaining consistency across the resume data model.
11-11: LGTM! Well-placed validation annotations.The validation annotations are correctly positioned and use appropriate validators:
- Date fields (
start_date,end_date) usevalidate_datefor ISO8601 compliance- URL field uses
validate_urlfor RFC 3986 complianceThe placement respects the serde field renaming attributes.
Also applies to: 14-14, 18-18
src/resume/work.rs (3)
1-3: LGTM! Validation integration follows established pattern.The imports are clean and consistent with the validation framework applied across other resume structs.
5-5: LGTM! Validation trait correctly derived.Adding
Validateto the derive macro enables runtime validation for the Work struct, completing the validation coverage for this data model component.
10-10: LGTM! Proper validation annotations applied.The validation annotations are well-positioned and use the correct validators:
urlfield validates against RFC 3986 usingvalidate_urlstart_dateandend_datefields validate against ISO8601 format usingvalidate_dateThis ensures data integrity for critical work experience fields.
Also applies to: 13-13, 16-16
src/validation.rs (4)
6-14: LGTM! Robust URL validation implementation.The
validate_urlfunction properly uses theurlcrate for RFC 3986 compliance. The pattern of handlingOption<String>with early return forNonevalues is consistent and appropriate for optional fields.
17-31: LGTM! Simple and effective country code validation.The ISO-3166-1 ALPHA-2 validation using regex
^[A-Z]{2}$is appropriate for the use case. The implementation correctly validates the two-letter uppercase format.
33-43: LGTM! Proper email validation using established crate.Using the
email_addresscrate'sis_validmethod is a good choice for email validation, as it handles the complexity of email format validation better than regex patterns.
68-324: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite provides excellent coverage with:
- Valid and invalid cases for each validator
- Edge cases and boundary conditions
- Proper handling of
Nonevalues- Clear test organization and descriptive assertions
The commented-out TODO tests indicate awareness of current limitations, which is good documentation for future improvements.
Lab3ss
force-pushed
the
add_validation
branch
2 times, most recently
from
cb032d0 to
50e157e
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests