Add Provisioning YAML File #180
Conversation
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
add to approvelist |
ishasahni2000
force-pushed
the
provisioingInterfaces
branch
6 times, most recently
from
be10620 to
3f22d38
Compare
Signed-off-by: Isha Sahni <[email protected]>
ishasahni2000
force-pushed
the
provisioingInterfaces
branch
from
3f22d38 to
c30a6c1
Compare
|
Hi @spinler |
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| name: xyz.openbmc_project.Provisioning | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think 'name' is a recognized field at this level?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, I wonder if this should be under Network. The upstream maintainer would have final say anyway I guess.
| accordingly. | ||
| parameters: [] | ||
|
|
||
| - name: CheckPeerBMCConnection |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@raviteja-b Is this the interface you were thinking RBMC manager would call? I don't think so, because the API I was thinking of checks if authentication is also good between the BMCs which means provisioning already has to have been completed on each.
| description: > | ||
| Starts the provisioning process and updates the ProvisioningState | ||
| accordingly. | ||
| parameters: [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you can just leave off this field if there are no parameters
| property to indicate whether the BMC is provisioned, and methods to initiate | ||
| provisioning and check the peer BMC connection. | ||
| properties: | ||
| - name: ProvisioningState |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
'State' sounds like it should be an enum. If it's just a bool, how just about something like 'Provisioned'?
doc referred : https://github.ibm.com/p11-fw-design/p11-fw-designs/blob/f729f6a52c0212e364e02fff8d1d003ebabd8e3e/designs/provisioning/README.md