-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Implement ReadyToRunHelperNode for WASM #133739
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Copilot
wants to merge
15
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
copilot/implement-readytorunhelpernode-for-wasm
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+207
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
09c2551
Initial plan
Copilot 04fa490
Implement ReadyToRun helpers for WASM
Copilot b28278b
Apply suggestion from @jtschuster
jtschuster 1f86558
Inline WASM helper return calls
Copilot beeb70d
Move WASM helper signature implementation
Copilot a618858
Generalize WASM signature dependencies
Copilot bbfadc8
Restore ReadyToRun dependency list flow
Copilot 3bb277d
Initialize WASM helper signatures lazily
Copilot 8888ff5
Simplify lazy WASM signature getter
Copilot ab9c8ca
Merge branch 'main' into copilot/implement-readytorunhelpernode-for-wasm
jtschuster 26c2d28
Fix parameter count for ResolveVirtualFunction helper
jtschuster 82510ef
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into copilot/implement-rea…
Copilot f42811e
Apply batched suggestions from code review
jtschuster 19a7f9a
Refactor wasmTypeNode assignment with type check
jtschuster 29acc10
Make WASM signature initializer instance-based
Copilot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't look right. #133739 (comment) pointed out a bug in IMethodCodeNodeWithTypeSignature.HasGenericContextArg saying it doesn't match what
LoweringFlags GetLoweringFlags(MethodDesc method).Shouldn't the fix be in
IMethodCodeNodeWithTypeSignature?