Skip to content

Update celestia-app-metrics.md with Tenderduty #2043

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bernatfp
Copy link

@bernatfp bernatfp commented May 20, 2025

Add reference to Tenderduty as an alternative for monitoring and alerting.

We use both Grafana and Tenderduty to monitor our Celestia testnet validator, as well as our other Tendermint validators.

We think it may be valuable for fellow operators to be aware of it.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the guide to recommend Tenderduty as an alternative alerting solution for validators, alongside Grafana OnCall.

Add reference to Tenderduty as an alternative for monitoring and alerting.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation for Celestia app metrics was updated to recommend Tenderduty as an alternative alerting solution for validators, in addition to the existing suggestion of Grafana OnCall. No code or public entity declarations were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
how-to-guides/celestia-app-metrics.md Added a recommendation for Tenderduty as an alternative alerting tool for validators.

Poem

A hop and a skip, new alerts on the way,
Tenderduty joins Grafana, to brighten your day.
Metrics and warnings, both clear and astute,
Now validators have choices—how resolute!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
how-to-guides/celestia-app-metrics.md (1)

163-165: Correct preposition usage.

Use “independent of Grafana” instead of “independent from Grafana” for the standard collocation in English.

- In addition, if you're running a validator and want an alternative layer of alerts independent from Grafana, you may want to check out [Tenderduty](https://github.com/Firstset/tenderduty).
+ In addition, if you're running a validator and want an alternative layer of alerts independent of Grafana, you may want to check out [Tenderduty](https://github.com/Firstset/tenderduty).
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~164-~164: The usual collocation for “independent” is “of”, not “from”. Did you mean “independent of”?
Context: ...nd want an alternative layer of alerts independent from Grafana, you may want to check out [Ten...

(INDEPENDENTLY_FROM_OF)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50b6d5c and 5278130.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • how-to-guides/celestia-app-metrics.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
how-to-guides/celestia-app-metrics.md

[grammar] ~164-~164: The usual collocation for “independent” is “of”, not “from”. Did you mean “independent of”?
Context: ...nd want an alternative layer of alerts independent from Grafana, you may want to check out [Ten...

(INDEPENDENTLY_FROM_OF)

@jcstein jcstein requested a review from mindstyle85 May 23, 2025 17:01
@jcstein
Copy link
Member

jcstein commented May 23, 2025

Is this advisable @mindstyle85 ?

@jcstein jcstein requested a review from Copilot June 3, 2025 09:40
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@jcstein jcstein requested a review from sysrex June 4, 2025 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants