Skip to content

fix: patch rather than sleep for time sensitive pytest #1344

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2025

Conversation

bzwei
Copy link
Collaborator

@bzwei bzwei commented Jun 10, 2025

Attempt to fix test_read_remote_setting that fails sporadically.

@bzwei bzwei requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2025 18:19
@bzwei bzwei requested a review from Alex-Izquierdo June 10, 2025 18:19
Copy link

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.91%. Comparing base (2dcbc2e) to head (7f15061).

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1344   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.91%   93.91%           
=======================================
  Files         319      319           
  Lines       18780    18781    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        17637    17638    +1     
  Misses       1143     1143           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-int-tests-3.11 93.85% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit-int-tests-3.12 93.91% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
tests/unit/test_application_settings.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bzwei bzwei merged commit a4864e8 into ansible:main Jun 10, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants