-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
Raspberry pi check for Freeswitch 1.7 #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -10,8 +10,11 @@ PROC?=$(shell uname -m) | |
|
|
||
| CC=gcc | ||
| CFLAGS=-fPIC -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic | ||
| MODEL=$(cat /proc/device-tree/model) | ||
| ifeq (${PROC},x86_64) | ||
| CFLAGS+=-m64 -mtune=generic | ||
| else ifneq (,$(findstring "Raspberry Pi", $(MODEL))) | ||
|
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would check the PROC var, or at least leverage on uname:
I don't have a rpi now to check what Right now (without your mods), what happens?
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok ,
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ok, so please update the PR (and rebase it to have a single commit) and I'll be happy to check it again and merge!
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is pretty much a duplicate of my pr #19 Just need to eliminate the usage of m32 etc from non x86 based architectures like arm etc.
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
| -march=armv7 | ||
| else | ||
| CFLAGS+=-m32 -march=i686 | ||
| endif | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this will fail on standard system and no error handling is done