Skip to content

Conversation

@JimJJewett
Copy link

The existing text claimed that line commands H and h (and V and v) were equivalent; the capitalized versions should still be in absolute terms. If, for backwards compatibility reasons, the existing text is correct, this should be called out explicitly.

The existing text claimed that line commands H and h (and V and v) were equivalent; the capitalized versions should still be in absolute terms.  If, for backwards compatibility reasons, the existing text is correct, this should be called out explicitly.
@JimJJewett
Copy link
Author

I consider this an editorial clarification, which I think is classified as non-substantive. It isn't clear whether I can (or even should be able to) make that classification.

Alternatively, I'm probably willing to sign the appropriate waivers, though I didn't see a link to what they are. (Apologies if they are visible to someone less oblivious and/or not using a high-contrast viewer.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant