-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.7k
Turbopack: cache directory creation #78729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f20de35
use try_for_each_concurrent
sokra 2209f25
cache directory creation
sokra 04404fa
only cache created directories per apply_effects call
sokra f43ae7b
use unsafe for better performance
sokra 0b9d3a8
clippy
sokra bbc0615
lint fixes
sokra 8fe8cf0
ApplyEffectContent can't be used in spawn_blocking
sokra fd9b657
rename and fixes
sokra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know you're just copying this, but we really shouldn't retry filesystem operations. They shouldn't fail transiently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you mean that?
At least on windows fs operations sometimes fail with permission errors while the antivir is scanning the file. That will automatically resolve by retrying.
We also do that in webpack using graceful-fs
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WTF, that's insane. I've never seen a unix tool retry filesystem operations.
Is this maybe just for deletions that this can happen? I know Windows has a restriction that you can't unlink an open file. If that's the case, we should only retry deletions.
EDIT: fsspec/filesystem_spec#776 I guess it can happen with writes too 😞 . Maybe we should only do this on Windows?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
v0 thinks retries makes sense on linux too
https://v0.dev/chat/KFWvUZ7IY9T