fix processing time bucket #110
Conversation
akashg3627
requested review from
debajyoti-truefoundry,
chiragjn and
nikp1172
as code owners
WalkthroughThe change updates the histogram bucket ranges for message processing time metrics in the Prometheus integration, extending the upper bound of the final bucket from 35,000 ms to 36,000 ms. No other logic, error handling, or control flow is altered in this update. Changes
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
async_processor/prometheus_metrics.py(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test (windows-latest, 3.8)
| @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ | |||
| + list(range(750, 5250, 250)) # 18 | |||
| + list(range(5500, 10500, 500)) # 10 | |||
| + list(range(11000, 16000, 1000)) # 5 | |||
| + list(range(16000, 35000, 5000)), # 4 | |||
| + list(range(16000, 36000, 5000)), # 4 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ineffective upper-bound update in histogram buckets.
The change from range(16000, 35000, 5000) to range(16000, 36000, 5000) does not actually include 36000, since Python’s range excludes the stop value. The resulting bucket list is still [16000, 21000, 26000, 31000], so the intended extension isn’t applied. To include a boundary at 36000, adjust the stop to 36001 or append it explicitly. For example:
- + list(range(16000, 36000, 5000)), # 4
+ + list(range(16000, 36001, 5000)), # 5📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| + list(range(16000, 36000, 5000)), # 4 | |
| - list(range(16000, 36000, 5000)), # 4 | |
| + list(range(16000, 36001, 5000)), # 5 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In async_processor/prometheus_metrics.py at line 41, the range used for
histogram buckets ends at 36000 but does not include it because Python's range
excludes the stop value. To fix this, change the stop value from 36000 to 36001
or explicitly append 36000 to the list to ensure the upper bound is included in
the buckets.
Summary by CodeRabbit