Skip to content

🚨 TEST: False Negative Detection - Real Vulnerabilities#7

Closed
trsdn wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/false-negative-detection
Closed

🚨 TEST: False Negative Detection - Real Vulnerabilities#7
trsdn wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/false-negative-detection

Conversation

@trsdn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@trsdn trsdn commented Sep 17, 2025

⚠️ WARNING: THIS PR CONTAINS REAL SECURITY VULNERABILITIES

Purpose

This PR tests if our CI/CD system properly catches false negatives - i.e., real security and code quality issues that should NOT be missed.

Real Issues Added (SHOULD ALL BE DETECTED):

🔓 Security Vulnerabilities:

  • SQL Injection - Unsafe string interpolation in database queries
  • Command Injection - Unsafe subprocess.run with shell=True
  • Remote Code Execution - Unsafe pickle.loads() deserialization
  • Path Traversal - No validation on file path access
  • Hardcoded Secrets - Production secrets in source code

🐛 Code Quality Issues:

  • Uninitialized Variables - Variable used before assignment
  • Infinite Recursion - Function with no base case
  • Division by Zero - No safety checks
  • Memory Leaks - Circular references
  • Race Conditions - Unsafe shared variable access
  • Import Errors - Non-existent module imports
  • Unreachable Code - Dead code after return statements

Expected Results:

  • ALL Security scans should FAIL
  • CodeQL should detect multiple HIGH/MEDIUM alerts
  • Linting should find numerous issues
  • This PR should be BLOCKED from merging

Success Criteria:

If our CI/CD system is working correctly, this PR should:

  1. Trigger security alerts
  2. Fail all quality gates
  3. Generate detailed issue reports
  4. Request changes due to critical issues

🚫 DO NOT MERGE - THIS IS A TEST PR WITH REAL VULNERABILITIES

⚠️  WARNING: This commit contains REAL security vulnerabilities and code quality issues!

Added the following GENUINE problems that SHOULD be caught by CI/CD:

SECURITY VULNERABILITIES:
- SQL injection vulnerability
- Command injection vulnerability
- Unsafe pickle deserialization (RCE)
- Path traversal vulnerability
- Hardcoded secrets in production code
- Multiple authentication bypasses

CODE QUALITY ISSUES:
- Uninitialized variable usage
- Infinite recursion
- Division by zero
- Memory leaks
- Race conditions
- Unreachable code
- Import errors

This tests if our CI/CD system properly catches false negatives.
DO NOT MERGE - FOR TESTING ONLY!
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

These are genuine problems that SHOULD be detected.
"""

import os

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unused import Note

Import of 'os' is not used.

Copilot Autofix

AI 8 months ago

The best fix is to remove the import os statement from line 8 in markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py. This does not affect program functionality, as the module was never used. Simply delete the line to resolve the code quality issue.

Suggested changeset 1
markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
--- a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
+++ b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 These are genuine problems that SHOULD be detected.
 """
 
-import os
 import subprocess
 import pickle
 import tempfile
EOF
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
These are genuine problems that SHOULD be detected.
"""

import os
import subprocess
import pickle
import tempfile
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
import os
import subprocess
import pickle
import tempfile

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unused import Note

Import of 'tempfile' is not used.

Copilot Autofix

AI 8 months ago

The single best way to fix this issue is to delete the import tempfile statement on line 11 of markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py. No other changes are necessary, as no code in the snippet references tempfile, and removing the unused import will not affect the functionality of the code.

Suggested changeset 1
markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
--- a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
+++ b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
 import os
 import subprocess
 import pickle
-import tempfile
 from typing import Any
 
 
EOF
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
import os
import subprocess
import pickle
import tempfile
from typing import Any


Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
if condition:
result = "success"
# Bug: result is not defined if condition is False
return result # UnboundLocalError when condition is False

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Potentially uninitialized local variable Error

Local variable 'result' may be used before it is initialized.

Copilot Autofix

AI 8 months ago

The correct and simplest way to fix this code quality issue is to ensure that the local variable result is initialized regardless of the value of condition. This can be achieved by adding an else clause after the if condition: block (line 54), so that result is assigned a value in both scenarios. For example, if "failure" or another appropriate string is returned when the condition is false, the code’s function and signature remain unchanged.

Edit only lines 54 to 57 in broken_function to add the missing initialization for result.

No new imports or external dependencies are needed.

Suggested changeset 1
markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
--- a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
+++ b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@
     """This function has uninitialized variable usage."""
     if condition:
         result = "success"
-    # Bug: result is not defined if condition is False
+    else:
+        result = "failure"
     return result  # UnboundLocalError when condition is False
 
 
EOF
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@
"""This function has uninitialized variable usage."""
if condition:
result = "success"
# Bug: result is not defined if condition is False
else:
result = "failure"
return result # UnboundLocalError when condition is False


Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.


# CODE QUALITY ISSUE 5: Race condition
import threading

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unused import Note

Import of 'threading' is not used.

Copilot Autofix

AI 8 months ago

The best way to fix this problem is to remove the unused import statement from the codebase. Specifically, in markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py, delete the line import threading at line 85. This edit can be made safely as there is no usage of threading in the visible code. No impacts to functionality are expected, as the code does not rely on the module at all.


Suggested changeset 1
markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
--- a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
+++ b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@
 
 
 # CODE QUALITY ISSUE 5: Race condition
-import threading
 
 shared_counter = 0
 
EOF
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@


# CODE QUALITY ISSUE 5: Race condition
import threading

shared_counter = 0

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
def unreachable_code_example():
"""Contains unreachable code."""
return "early return"
print("This line is never reached") # Unreachable code

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unreachable code Warning

This statement is unreachable.

Copilot Autofix

AI 8 months ago

To fix the unreachable code, we need to remove all code that comes after the return statement inside the unreachable_code_example function. Specifically, delete lines 101 and 102 (print("This line is never reached") and x = 5 + 5). Retain only the return statement and the function definition/comments. This preserves the existing functionality (the function still returns "early return") but eliminates unreachable statements, cleaning up the code and addressing the warning.


Suggested changeset 1
markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
--- a/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
+++ b/markitdown_mcp/vulnerable_code.py
@@ -98,8 +98,6 @@
 def unreachable_code_example():
     """Contains unreachable code."""
     return "early return"
-    print("This line is never reached")  # Unreachable code
-    x = 5 + 5  # Unreachable code
 
 
 # PERFORMANCE ISSUE: Inefficient nested loops
EOF
@@ -98,8 +98,6 @@
def unreachable_code_example():
"""Contains unreachable code."""
return "early return"
print("This line is never reached") # Unreachable code
x = 5 + 5 # Unreachable code


# PERFORMANCE ISSUE: Inefficient nested loops
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@trsdn trsdn closed this Sep 17, 2025
@trsdn trsdn deleted the test/false-negative-detection branch September 17, 2025 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants