Skip to content

Conversation

s-h-a-d-o-w
Copy link

@s-h-a-d-o-w s-h-a-d-o-w commented Jan 11, 2025

What:

Since you're currently mentioning "./vitest.setup.ts", I figured that you're fine with using TS and this change does so consistently. (And once that is done, it's no longer necessary to add the setup file to the includes.)

Why:

Instructions are currently inconsistent.

Checklist:

  • Documentation
  • Tests N/A
  • Updated Type Definitions N/A
  • Ready to be merged

Copy link

@Bhavana104 Bhavana104 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reviewed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants