Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
tensorchord/VectorChord major 0.5.3 -> 1.0.0

Release Notes

tensorchord/VectorChord (tensorchord/VectorChord)

v1.0.0

Compare Source

VectorChord 1.0 Release Notes

VectorChord 1.0 is here. This release delivers much faster PostgreSQL index builds with IVF + RaBitQ, quicker updates, broader architecture support, and a stack of new features since our first release. It’s a major milestone—production-ready and thoroughly tested.

Highlights

We have dramatically optimized index build speed, now capable of building a 100M-vector dataset in 20 minutes on a 16-vCPU machine while sharply cutting memory usage, making index construction in production far more convenient.

What's changed since 0.5

Performance & scalability
  • Lock-contention optimizations in index building
  • Faster table sampling in index building
  • Hierarchical K-means
  • Dimension reduction in K-means
  • Parallel compacting in index building
  • Prints estimated memory usage in index building
Fixes
  • Don't use expensive Rayon fold/reduce
  • Freespace recycle in vchordg

Full Changelog: tensorchord/VectorChord@0.5.3...1.0.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) November 12, 2025 04:57
@renovate renovate bot merged commit f03c948 into main Nov 12, 2025
7 checks passed
@xieydd xieydd deleted the renovate/tensorchord-vectorchord-1.x branch November 12, 2025 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants