Skip to content

refactor(bench): remove latency table from summary#3365

Closed
decofe wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
yk/remove-latency-table
Closed

refactor(bench): remove latency table from summary#3365
decofe wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
yk/remove-latency-table

Conversation

@decofe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@decofe decofe commented Mar 30, 2026

Block time metrics (p50/p90/p99) already capture inter-block timing — the latency fields from report.json were computing the same thing. Drops all latency_* fields from summary.json and removes the "Latency (Secondary)" table from summary.md to avoid confusion.

Follow-up to #3348.

Prompted by: YK

Block time metrics (p50/p90/p99) already capture inter-block timing.
The latency fields from report.json were computing the same thing,
so drop them to avoid confusion.

Co-authored-by: YK <46377366+yongkangc@users.noreply.github.com>
Amp-Thread-ID: https://ampcode.com/threads/T-019d3efe-b268-771a-a069-b5fa33370253
Clarify the user-facing block time labels in Slack and the generated summary.

Co-Authored-By: YK <46377366+yongkangc@users.noreply.github.com>
Clarify which TPS metric is computed over the full run duration.

Co-Authored-By: YK <46377366+yongkangc@users.noreply.github.com>
Show elapsed run time instead of mislabeled wall clock TPS in the bench summary and Slack output.

Co-Authored-By: YK <46377366+yongkangc@users.noreply.github.com>
Rename the wall clock delta formatter to better reflect the metric and spread it formats.

Co-Authored-By: YK <46377366+yongkangc@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2026

This PR has been marked stale due to 7 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 8, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closed due to inactivity. Reopen if still needed.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Apr 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants