Skip to content

revert: favicon location #656

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

jycouet
Copy link
Contributor

@jycouet jycouet commented Jul 31, 2025

While Failing to set <svelte:head> element with getAttribute is not a function svelte#15337 is open, let's revert the location of the favicon.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 31, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4b5778f

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
sv Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npx https://pkg.pr.new/sveltejs/cli/sv@656
npx https://pkg.pr.new/sveltejs/cli/svelte-migrate@656

commit: 4b5778f

@jycouet jycouet mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2025
4 tasks
'sv': patch
---

revert: favicon location to `/static/favicon.svg`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this mention the minimal template as the previous PR did?

@manuel3108
Copy link
Member

This is not happening for me. I did mention in the maintainers chat that we should merge a fix for the original issue inside svelte, instead of reverting this, as this is not happening for everyone and seems to be related to browser extensions or something.

Let's hold off from this for a few days.

@hyunbinseo
Copy link
Contributor

I believe a starter template should be conservative.

It is a bug in the wild, and it could happen to the customer - not to the developer.

If the sole purpose is to demonstrate Vite's asset import, maybe an image loading comparison could be added?

@jycouet
Copy link
Contributor Author

jycouet commented Aug 2, 2025

As it's the minimal template, it should probably not be too bloated. I would not add a separate image loading, as this belongs more to a demo.

I and my customers didn't experience this bug (sentry setup), I can imagine that it's fairly limited (but I don't know, just feeling).
At the same time, I agree that it should be conservative, but showing best practices!

All in all, I don't know! :)

The best would of course be to fix the underlying bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants