Skip to content

Conversation

@srilekhad
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:
    • The solution is efficient with optimal time and space complexity.
    • The code is clean, readable, and well-commented.
    • The logic is correct and handles all edge cases.
  • Areas for Improvement:
    • The verification loop could be simplified further by removing the conditional check for i < ptnlCand and i > ptnlCand. The condition if(knows(ptnlCand, i) || !knows(i, ptnlCand)) is sufficient for all cases.
    • The variable name ptnlCand could be shortened to candidate for brevity without losing clarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants