Skip to content

Conversation

@yashsonkamble
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • The solution is well-implemented and efficient. The logic to first identify a potential candidate and then verify it is correct and optimal.
  • The variable name ptnlCand could be more descriptive, such as potential_candidate to follow Python naming conventions better.
  • The comments at the top of the file are helpful, but adding a brief explanation of the approach in the docstring would enhance readability and understanding for others.
  • The condition if i < ptnlCand in the verification loop is unnecessary since the first loop ensures that ptnlCand is not known by any previous candidate. This could be simplified to just check if knows(ptnlCand, i) or not knows(i, ptnlCand) for all i.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants