done

[ShrinidhiMane]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

• Strengths:

  • The logic for transferring elements between stacks is correctly implemented.
  • The solution handles edge cases, such as an empty queue, appropriately.
  • The use of two stacks to simulate a queue is correctly applied.

• Areas for Improvement:

  • Variable Naming: Use more descriptive names for variables. For example, t could be renamed to outSt to make it clear that it represents the output stack.
  • Code Formatting: Ensure consistent spacing around operators and braces to improve readability. For example, while(!in.isEmpty()){t.push(in.pop());} should be formatted as while (!in.isEmpty()) { t.push(in.pop()); }.
  • Redundant Transfers: In the peek method, the transfer from in to t should only occur if t is empty. The current implementation is correct but could be slightly optimized by checking t.isEmpty() before transferring.
  • Unused Code: The MyHashMap class is included in the submission but is not relevant to the problem. Ensure only the necessary code is submitted.