Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 26, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.53.18.54.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.53.18.54.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.54.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin-internal: add prefer-tsutils-methods rule (#​11974, #​11625)
  • typescript-estree: add shortcut methods to ParserServicesWithTypeInformation (#​11965, #​11955)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] check both base constraint and actual type for non-null assertions (#​11967, #​11559)
  • deps: update dependency prettier to v3.8.0 (#​11991)
  • scope-manager: fix catch clause scopes def.name (#​11982)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unused-private-class-members] private destructured class member is defined but used (#​11785)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.54.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 26, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: yarn.lock
! Corepack is about to download https://repo.yarnpkg.com/4.12.0/packages/yarnpkg-cli/bin/yarn.js
/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:22096
    throw new Error(
          ^

Error: Server answered with HTTP 500 when performing the request to https://repo.yarnpkg.com/4.12.0/packages/yarnpkg-cli/bin/yarn.js; for troubleshooting help, see https://github.com/nodejs/corepack#troubleshooting
    at fetch (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:22096:11)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:103:5)
    at async fetchUrlStream (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:22119:20)
    at async download (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:22290:18)
    at async installVersion (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:22386:55)
    at async Engine.ensurePackageManager (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:22899:32)
    at async Engine.executePackageManagerRequest (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:23010:25)
    at async Object.runMain (/opt/containerbase/tools/corepack/0.34.6/24.13.0/node_modules/corepack/dist/lib/corepack.cjs:23710:7)

Node.js v24.13.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants