SF-3490 Show who created a draft

[pmachapman]

This PR adds a line to the bottom of the build details showing who started the build and when (when this data is available).

@Nateowami Was this what you were expecting for this change? I didn't add it to the date subtitle, as saying "Build completed by User 123 at Aug 6 2025, 12:01 AM" didn't really make sense to me (unless you can think of better wording?)

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.42%. Comparing base (910b5c4) to head (f7cffb6).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3350   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.42%   82.42%           
=======================================
  Files         607      607           
  Lines       35537    35537           
  Branches     5789     5789           
=======================================
  Hits        29291    29291           
  Misses       5369     5369           
  Partials      877      877           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Nateowami]

@pmachapman Can you update the wording of the footer to say e.g. Completed at <date>? JoEllen and both assumed it was showing the time it was requested when we wrote the issue description.

Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @pmachapman)

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/ClientApp/src/assets/i18n/non_checking_en.json line 279 at r1 (raw file):

    "format_draft": "Format draft",
    "hide_model_training_configuration": "Hide model training configuration",
    "requested_at": "Requested at {{ requestedAtDate }}.",

In English, we'd generally say something happened on a date, or at a time. I would supposed other languages may do the same. Can you rename this variable to something like requestedAtTime or requestedAtDateTime so the translators will know it's the time, and not just the date?

(Personally I also think in English it flows better without "at". For example, "Requested July 3, 2025 4:23 PM").

[pmachapman]

I named it completed, but it look funny for a cancelled build. Does describing it as finished work?

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @Nateowami)

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/ClientApp/src/assets/i18n/non_checking_en.json line 279 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, Nateowami wrote…

In English, we'd generally say something happened on a date, or at a time. I would supposed other languages may do the same. Can you rename this variable to something like requestedAtTime or requestedAtDateTime so the translators will know it's the time, and not just the date?

(Personally I also think in English it flows better without "at". For example, "Requested July 3, 2025 4:23 PM").

Done.

[Nateowami]

I agree; "completed" isn't the best word for failures. Finished is good.

One minor comment, but

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @pmachapman)

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/ClientApp/src/assets/i18n/non_checking_en.json line 277 at r2 (raw file):

    "draft_unknown": "Unknown",
    "error_details": "Please include these details when contacting support for assistance",
    "finished_at": "Finished at {{ finishedAtTime }}",

Maybe drop the "at" here as well?

[pmachapman]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @pmachapman)

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/ClientApp/src/assets/i18n/non_checking_en.json line 277 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, Nateowami wrote…

Maybe drop the "at" here as well?

Done. I first thought it looked funny, but looking again, it looks better. Thanks!