chore fix failling mobile sdk demo e2e test

[transphorm]

Description

A brief description of the changes, what and how is being changed.

Tested

Explain how the change has been tested (for example by manual testing, unit tests etc) or why it's not necessary (for example version bump).

How to QA

How can the change be tested in a repeatable manner?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Enhanced iOS E2E workflow to build and verify unsigned Release archives of the iOS app as part of the automated testing pipeline.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions step to the iOS E2E workflow that builds an unsigned Release archive of the mobile SDK demo app using xcodebuild, with disabled code signing, and verifies the archive creation before proceeding with testing.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
iOS E2E Workflow .github/workflows/mobile-sdk-demo-e2e.yml	Added new xcodebuild archive step for Release configuration with code signing disabled (CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY, CODE_SIGNING_REQUIRED/ALLOWED, AD_HOC_CODE_SIGNING_ALLOWED set to NO). Includes verification check to confirm archive creation at packages/mobile-sdk-demo/ios/build/SelfDemoApp.xcarchive before proceeding.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• SELF-831: Add mobile demo app e2e tests #1185: Modifies the same iOS E2E workflow file and build path, establishing the foundation for this unsigned Release archive addition.
• Unify local e2e logic #1651: Adjusts xcodebuild invocations and build flags for iOS, directly related to the archive building and signing configuration logic introduced here.

Suggested labels

codex

Poem

🏗️ A new archive is born,
Unsigned and bold, Release reborn,
Code signing halted, verification stands,
The xcarchive lands in careful hands,
CI flows on, unencumbered and free! 📦

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description contains only the template placeholders with no actual content filled in—sections are empty beyond underscore markers, providing no concrete details about the changes, testing, or QA steps.	Fill in all template sections with specific details: describe the archive build step, explain how it was tested, and provide repeatable QA instructions.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title references fixing a failing mobile SDK demo E2E test, which aligns with the changeset that adds an unsigned Release archive build step to the iOS E2E workflow.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch justin/chore-fix-failling-mobile-sdk-demo-e2e-test

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}