Skip to content

Added traefik 3.0 setup steps #916

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

OisinHick
Copy link

@OisinHick OisinHick commented Apr 20, 2025

Hey there!

Really love this project and wanted to set it up to run behind my VPS using Traefik 3.

I have added steps to put croc behind traefik. This took me a bit of work to get up and running perfectly, and given traefik is a popular proxy, I wanted to share this with the community.

I'm aware there is alot of users just editing readmes and then commiting, so I can also submit the traefik.yml and croc.yml files to an examples folder upon @schollz request.

- Added steps to put croc behind traefik. This took me a bit of work to get up and running perfectly and given traefik is a popular proxy I wanted to share this with the community
@OisinHick OisinHick changed the title Update README.md Added traefik 3.0 setup steps Apr 20, 2025
@OisinHick OisinHick mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2025
@vaygr
Copy link

vaygr commented May 2, 2025

TLS part should be removed, it's unsupported configuration. Has nothing to do with cloudflare.

I have Let's Encrypt configured, and on initial send I get the error:

could not connect to ...: initial bytes are not magic: 48545450

@OisinHick
Copy link
Author

OisinHick commented May 3, 2025

TLS part should be removed, it's unsupported configuration. Has nothing to do with cloudflare.

I have Let's Encrypt configured, and on initial send I get the error:

could not connect to ...: initial bytes are not magic: 48545450

Sure, give me a day I will take it out I also think I have a way to add the other ports. What are your thoughts? Should I leave the other ports it uses out? @vaygr

@vaygr
Copy link

vaygr commented May 4, 2025

@OisinHick yes I would remove any mentions regarding TLS. The other ports part really depends on the outcome of the discussion in the referenced issue. I'm not convinced that traffic is going through the relay with this configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants