Skip to content

Conversation

@pd3
Copy link
Member

@pd3 pd3 commented Dec 16, 2021

as triggered by samtools/bcftools#1622 and #593

State explicitly that missing vectors (.) in fields of variable length are in BCF represented as MISSING,END_OF_VECTOR, i.e. the leading MISSING value must be always present.

@hts-specs-bot
Copy link

Changed PDFs as of 9a5fdb0: VCFv4.3 (diff). This link will expire in 30 days

@jmarshall
Copy link
Member

#593 makes a case that [END_OF_VECTOR, END_OF_VECTOR] would also be a reasonable encoding of this situation.

What is the reason for requiring that “[e]mpty vectors (i.e. vectors with no data available)” be represented as [MISSING, END_OF_VECTOR] (which is seemingly less empty!)?

@jkbonfield
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #593

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: Needs review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants