Replace warp with axum #2748
Merged
Replace warp with axum #2748
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ehuss
reviewed
Jul 10, 2025
jelmer
force-pushed
the
warp-to-axum
branch
3 times, most recently
from
99a0a14 to
f91b511
Compare
warp is problematic for Debian, since it has some outdated dependencies. Upstream is also fairly dormant.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is more of a proof of concept and a question - but I figured I'd put it up since I'd already done to work to see if it can be done: I'm curious if you'd be open to a migration to axum (or perhaps something else?).
warp is problematic for Debian, since it has some outdated dependencies that we don't want to keep around just for warp; upstream is dormant (last change was about a year ago). mdbook is the only thing that actually uses warp nowadays in Debian.
(cc @plugwash)