Test NixOS/nixpkgs#541797. - #492
Conversation
e1e6862 to
980f6be
Compare
|
I was getting confused with some of the errors that I get in CI, but actually, I just realized now that I should simply ignore all the What I'm still having trouble understanding is why I need to keep the |
|
Actually, it appears that there is an issue with correctly propagating the overridden versions from |
|
I'll have a look |
3f746ba to
2aed22b
Compare
|
So, I rebased the nixpkgs branch and did some cleanup of the toolbox. CI here is green which is good. However, I tested it on mathcomp CI (to test other overrides than just Rocq itself): math-comp/math-comp#1634 There we can observe the following remaining issues:
|
b5eaa74 to
afb6a40
Compare
afb6a40 to
80f1b09
Compare
d7a3696 to
b12fb2b
Compare
|
Doing some more cleanup in the toolbox and a few fixes in nixpkgs, CI is finally happy both here and in math-comp/math-comp#1634 |
|
Thanks! After this change, it might be finally time to rename the Coq Nix Toolbox to the Rocq Nix Toolbox 🎉 |
b12fb2b to
1e2e8ae
Compare
Test NixOS/nixpkgs#541797.