-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 576
remove unused imports and functions + replace print with logger calls #158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
SkalskiP
wants to merge
6
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
clean_unused_code_add_logger
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d04f176
ready for tests
SkalskiP 4f33f02
refactor `engine.py` logging
SkalskiP 9c8f1fb
refactor `main.py` and `export.py`
SkalskiP 43d6052
refactor `coco.py`
SkalskiP 645d3cd
remove duplicated `get_version` function definition
SkalskiP 05aad32
Merge branch 'develop' into clean_unused_code_add_logger
SkalskiP File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there is a bug in the existing implementation that is stopping expanded_scales from getting propagated to the dataset when training on roboflow data. you can see it clearly here. this change fixes that bug, which will likely increase performance. however, it'll also slow down training a bit and increase memory usage a bit. not sure that's what we want. worth discussing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@isaacrob-roboflow what's your suggestion here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Want to keep the bug for now but comment that it exists, and then run a proper ablation so we know if it's worth including?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@isaacrob-roboflow That would be great! I’d really like to get this PR merged soon, since it touches a lot of areas and keeps running into conflicts. Plus, I’d rather not merge it right before the release — it increases the risk that something might go wrong.
Would you like me to add a TODO comment on line 239?
Alternatively, we could create a GitHub issue to track the problem. To be honest, I’d prefer the second option.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's do both and tag the issue in the comment?