Skip to content

Conversation

@davidemarcoli
Copy link
Collaborator

@davidemarcoli davidemarcoli commented Nov 4, 2025

Pull Request Check List

Resolves: #issue-number-here

  • Added tests for changed code.
  • Updated documentation for changed code.

Description:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling in item retrieval to ensure HTTP errors are properly returned with correct status codes, enhancing API reliability and response consistency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Walkthrough

Error handling in get_item was refined to re-raise HTTPException instances directly while preserving their HTTP semantics, rather than allowing them to be processed through generic exception handling paths. Existing database result cardinality validation remains intact.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Error handling refinement
src/routers/secure/items.py
Modified get_item function to re-raise HTTPException without transformation, preventing HTTP exceptions from being swallowed by generic exception handling

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify HTTPException re-raising logic doesn't alter intended exception propagation
  • Confirm existing "Multiple rows" exception handling remains unaffected

Poem

🐰 An exception caught, but not quite right—
Now HTTPExceptions see the light!
Re-raised with grace, no more delay,
Your error codes shall have their say! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is incomplete with placeholder text and no actual implementation details, making it impossible to understand the purpose, motivation, or scope of changes. Replace placeholder 'Resolves: #issue-number-here' with the actual issue number, provide detailed description of the HTTPException handling changes, and explain the motivation.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: refining HTTPException handling in the get_item function to preserve HTTP semantics.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bugfix/handle-http-exception-item-endpoint

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c5ac3b and b400c9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/routers/secure/items.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.14.3)
src/routers/secure/items.py

404-404: Use raise without specifying exception name

Remove exception name

(TRY201)

Comment on lines +403 to +404
if isinstance(e, HTTPException):
raise e
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major

Fix correctly preserves HTTPException semantics, but consider two improvements.

The change successfully prevents HTTPException instances (like the 404 at line 401) from being swallowed and re-wrapped as 500 errors.

However:

  1. Use bare raise instead of raise e to preserve the original traceback:
 if isinstance(e, HTTPException):
-    raise e
+    raise
  1. Consider narrowing the try-except scope. The current try block (lines 394-415) wraps both the database query (line 395) and business logic (lines 396-401). This causes the HTTPException at line 401 to be caught unnecessarily. A cleaner structure would separate concerns:
try:
    item: MediaItem = session.execute(query).unique().scalar_one_or_none()
except Exception as e:
    # Handle only database exceptions here
    if "Multiple rows were found" in str(e):
        items = session.execute(query).unique().scalars().all()
        duplicate_ids = {item.id for item in items}
        logger.debug(f"Multiple items found with ID {id}: {duplicate_ids}")
        raise HTTPException(
            status_code=500,
            detail=f"Multiple items found with ID {id}: {duplicate_ids}",
        )
    logger.error(f"Error fetching item with ID {id}: {str(e)}")
    raise HTTPException(status_code=500, detail=str(e)) from e

# Business logic outside try block (no HTTPException re-raising needed)
if item:
    if extended:
        return item.to_extended_dict()
    return item.to_dict()
else:
    raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Item not found")

Based on static analysis hints.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.14.3)

404-404: Use raise without specifying exception name

Remove exception name

(TRY201)

Copy link
Member

@dreulavelle dreulavelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you dont need the original traceback then its fine, otherwise might want to swap to raise instead of raise e.

else:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Item not found")
except Exception as e:
if isinstance(e, HTTPException):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just except this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants