Use strict priority in CI conda tests #552
Open
+14
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bdice
added
non-breaking
gforsyth
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2025
Member
|
To fix CI, think we first need to land this upstream change: rapidsai/cudf#20709 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR sets conda to use
strictpriority in CI tests.Mixing channel priority is frequently a cause of unexpected errors. Our CI jobs should always use strict priority in order to enforce that conda packages come from local channels with the artifacts built in CI, not mixing with older nightly artifacts from the
rapidsai-nightlychannel or other sources.xref: rapidsai/build-planning#14