Skip to content

Conversation

@trxcllnt
Copy link
Contributor

Support building with CMake v4+ to align with other RAPIDS repos.

This is required for NVAIE/DLFW builds of RAPIDS v25.12.

@trxcllnt trxcllnt requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2025 00:20
@trxcllnt trxcllnt requested review from msarahan and removed request for a team November 15, 2025 00:20
@trxcllnt trxcllnt added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Nov 15, 2025
@trxcllnt trxcllnt requested a review from pentschev November 15, 2025 00:20
- clang==20.1.4
- click >=8.1
- cmake>=3.30.4,<4
- cmake>=3.30.4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We occasionally have to do a dance when a cmake minor/point release is made because something has broken/rapids-cmake needs an update.

Can we upper-bound to currently known working 4.x versions?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made this align with the other RAPIDS repos. I think they don't pin to an upper bound because we want to pick up new features, @robertmaynard may have more insight.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I am aware RAPIDS works with any 4.X release so we are safe

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previous times when we needed to upper bound pin (via cursory search)

With no upper bound pin, on any future date we can arbitrarily break with no forewarning.

Although cmake is not the most frequent culprit here, removing an upper bound pin introduces one more place where it might happen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants