Conversation
WalkthroughAdds overflow detection to LibMemoryKV by introducing a new public error and a runtime check in the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/lib/LibMemoryKV.sol`:
- Around line 5-6: Remove the unused forge-std debug import by deleting the line
importing console2 (import {console2} from "forge-std/console2.sol";) from
LibMemoryKV.sol and ensure there are no remaining references to console2 in the
file; this eliminates a production dependency and reduces compilation footprint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/lib/LibMemoryKV.sol (1)
90-98: 🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 TrivialNo length-counter overflow check — but pointer overflow is always hit first.
Each insert allocates
0x60(96) bytes, so starting from the default free-memory pointer (0x80), the pointer crosses0xFFFFafter roughly(0xFFFF - 0x80) / 0x60 ≈ 682inserts. At that point the length counter is only ~1364, well within the 16-bit max of 65535. So the pointer guard implicitly protects the length as well.If the free-memory pointer is already high when
setis first called (due to other allocations), the headroom is even smaller, making the guard trigger earlier. This is worth documenting (e.g., a brief comment near line 101) so future maintainers don't wonder about a separate length-overflow check.
Motivation
Solution
Checks
By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests