Skip to content

add audit#11

Merged
thedavidmeister merged 3 commits intomainfrom
2026-02-09-audit
Feb 9, 2026
Merged

add audit#11
thedavidmeister merged 3 commits intomainfrom
2026-02-09-audit

Conversation

@thedavidmeister
Copy link
Contributor

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister commented Feb 9, 2026

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated configuration for license annotation tracking.
  • Tests

    • Improved test robustness by using dynamic iteration bounds instead of fixed values.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Walkthrough

Changes add an audit directory path to REUSE.toml license annotations and modify test iteration bounds in LibMemoryKV.storageParity.t.sol from fixed precomputed values to dynamic array length-based bounds.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration
REUSE.toml
Added "audit/**/" to the annotations path list for license tracking.
Test Logic
test/src/lib/LibMemoryKV.storageParity.t.sol
Changed loop iteration bounds from fixed variables (endOne/endTwo) to dynamic values based on resulting array lengths (finalKVs.length/finalKVsTwo.length).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'add audit' is vague and does not clearly convey what audit-related changes were made; it fails to summarize the actual substantive changes in the changeset. Use a more descriptive title that specifies what audit changes were made, such as 'add audit path annotation to REUSE.toml' or similar, to clarify the purpose of the PR.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 2026-02-09-audit

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister merged commit 7dc72b7 into main Feb 9, 2026
6 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant