Skip to content

supply missing in metafunction #110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2017
Merged

Conversation

haroldcarr
Copy link
Contributor

subtract and subtract1 tests fail because in is missing.

Note: in is defined in redex-doc/redex/scribblings/long-tut/code/common.rkt --- but that file is used in a different part of the tutorial. At this point in the tutorial the only import is (require redex).

@wilbowma
Copy link
Collaborator

wilbowma commented Jul 4, 2017

Is there a reason to redefine this instead adding an import from common.rkt?

@haroldcarr
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would vote to putting the definition in place (rather then import) to keep the exposition self-contained up to that point. For someone new to redex it is useful to see it in isolation.

@wilbowma
Copy link
Collaborator

wilbowma commented Jul 4, 2017

Aftering reading through the tutorial more carefully, I agree. Up to this point in the tutorial, common.rkt is not mentioned, and in just comes out of no where.

I'll merge this today if there are no objections.

@mfelleisen
Copy link
Contributor

See #112

@bennn bennn merged commit 81b440a into racket:master Jul 10, 2017
rfindler pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2017
(cherry picked from commit 81b440a)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants