Skip to content

using the same path ID, also for PATH_RESPONSE #573

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mirjak
Copy link
Collaborator

@mirjak mirjak commented Jun 13, 2025

fixes #546

Proposed rewrite by @huitema to make it more clear that using the same path does not automatically imply sending a PATH_RESPONSE

fixes #546

Proposed rewrite by @huitema to make it more clear that using the same path does not automatically imply sending a PATH_RESPONSE
Copy link
Contributor

@huitema huitema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK

Copy link
Contributor

@Yanmei-Liu Yanmei-Liu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Comment on lines +331 to +333
received by the server. If an endpoint receives a PATH_CHALLENGE, the
PATH_RESPONSE MUST be sent on the same path as the packet that contained
the PATH_CHALLENGE frame.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't it the case that you need to send these packets? Should that follow the "MUST validate" clause in the next paragraph instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Huge logical leap from opening a new path to PATH_RESPONSE
4 participants