-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 365
Fix Samsung Exynos 2000 series chipset detection #309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @bc-lee! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Testing on s908b
SoC name: Samsung Exynos 9925
Microarchitectures:
1x Cortex-X2
3x Cortex-A710
4x Cortex-A510
Cores:
0: 1 processor (0), ARM Cortex-X2
1: 1 processor (1), ARM Cortex-A710
2: 1 processor (2), ARM Cortex-A710
3: 1 processor (3), ARM Cortex-A710
4: 1 processor (4), ARM Cortex-A510
5: 1 processor (5), ARM Cortex-A510
6: 1 processor (6), ARM Cortex-A510
7: 1 processor (7), ARM Cortex-A510
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still looks good... needs CLA signed to land
Thanks for the review! Regarding the CLA, it's out of my hands, but I’ll ask my legal team to sign it as soon as possible. |
I signed the CLA! |
@digantdesai can you take a look? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Not sure why I don't see a button to run the CI, can you please rebase/repush? |
Add support for "s5e" prefix pattern matching in `ro.product.board` property to correctly identify Samsung Exynos 2000 series chipsets. These chipsets use generic identifiers (e.g., `s5e9925`) instead of marketing names like "Exynos 2200", but can still be identified and mapped to their corresponding models using external resources. Implements `match_s5e()` function to parse the s5e<4-digit-model> format.
Ok now I see the button. Its running :) |
Can you please fix the CI? |
@digantdesai I’ve pushed the changes. As before, you or a maintainer will need to trigger the CI. |
Add support for "s5e" prefix pattern matching in
ro.product.board
property to correctly identify Samsung Exynos 2000 series chipsets. These chipsets use generic identifiers (e.g.,s5e9925
) instead of marketing names like "Exynos 2200", but can still be identified and mapped to their corresponding models using external resources.Implements
match_s5e()
function to parse the s5e<4-digit-model> format.Fixes #308