Skip to content

Conversation

@Mzack9999
Copy link
Member

@Mzack9999 Mzack9999 commented Nov 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

Refactor

  • Enhanced asset ID validation behavior. Invalid identifiers now trigger warning messages and allow upload processing to continue, improving resilience during asset operations rather than halting execution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The SetAssetID method signature was modified to remove its error return type. Invalid asset IDs now trigger warning logs instead of returning errors. The corresponding call site in httpx.go was updated to remove the blank identifier assignment, reflecting the signature change.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
SetAssetID method signature update
internal/pdcp/writer.go, cmd/httpx/httpx.go
Modified SetAssetID to return void instead of error. Invalid asset IDs now log warnings via gologger and continue execution rather than returning errors. Updated call site removed blank identifier assignment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify that the signature change in writer.go is intentional and that error suppression via logging is acceptable
  • Confirm all call sites of SetAssetID are properly updated (only one visible in this diff)
  • Consider whether downstream code that may have previously handled errors from SetAssetID needs adjustment

Poem

🐰 A hop, a skip, no error to care,
SetAssetID logs warnings in the air,
The blank underscore bid its farewell,
No returns today—just warnings to tell! 🌟

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Fixing custom asset id upload' directly relates to the main change: removing error handling from SetAssetID to allow custom asset uploads without failing on validation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bugfix-allow-custom-asset-id

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d96574 and 8f407a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cmd/httpx/httpx.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/pdcp/writer.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/httpx/httpx.go (1)

138-138: LGTM!

The removal of the blank identifier assignment correctly reflects the updated SetAssetID signature, which no longer returns an error.

internal/pdcp/writer.go (1)

102-107: Verify that setting invalid asset IDs is intentional behavior.

The method now logs a warning for invalid asset IDs but still assigns them to u.assetGroupID (line 106). This means invalid IDs will be used in subsequent API requests (e.g., line 237: fmt.Sprintf(appendEndpoint, u.assetGroupID)), which may result in server-side rejections rather than failing fast at the client.

Is this intended to support custom asset ID formats beyond the xidRe pattern, or should invalid IDs be rejected by skipping the assignment?

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ehsandeep ehsandeep merged commit 27a22c6 into dev Nov 7, 2025
14 checks passed
@ehsandeep ehsandeep deleted the bugfix-allow-custom-asset-id branch November 7, 2025 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants