Skip to content

Conversation

@2nisb
Copy link
Contributor

@2nisb 2nisb commented Nov 20, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A PR or issue has been opened in all impacted repositories (if any)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Feature

What is the current behavior?

The opf implemented in #1071 does not support DC detailed components.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

It is now possible to launch opf on AC DC networks with DC detailed components

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information:

This PR is entirely based on #1071

@2nisb 2nisb force-pushed the opf-detailed-DC-components branch from 8e85f3e to 98df5e7 Compare November 20, 2025 09:49
@geofjamg geofjamg changed the base branch from main to opf_proto November 20, 2025 13:47
Denis Bonnand added 3 commits November 24, 2025 16:50
Signed-off-by: Denis Bonnand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Denis Bonnand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Denis Bonnand <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants