Skip to content

Conversation

@carojeandat
Copy link
Collaborator

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • A PR or issue has been opened in all impacted repositories (if any)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

@carojeandat carojeandat force-pushed the add-custom-base-voltages branch from e3139d7 to 2edc012 Compare November 5, 2025 10:22
@carojeandat carojeandat force-pushed the add-custom-base-voltages branch from f83df9f to ab58937 Compare November 25, 2025 14:41
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Jeandat <[email protected]>
@carojeandat carojeandat force-pushed the add-custom-base-voltages branch from ab58937 to 6be72bd Compare November 25, 2025 14:42
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
79.7% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants