Skip to content

Conversation

@RoxaneChen02
Copy link
Collaborator

@RoxaneChen02 RoxaneChen02 commented Nov 10, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

Fixes #1060

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Add PTDF sensitivity in ampere support, will be used later for loopflow computation in Ampere and relative margin objective function optimization in Ampere

What is the current behavior?

Currently, the PTDF sensitivity in ampere is not supported, and the existing unit tests cover only one side of the cases.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

  • Adds support for PTDF sensitivity in ampere.
  • Unit tests now cover both sides of the cases.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

@RoxaneChen02 RoxaneChen02 added the PR: waiting-for-review This PR is waiting to be reviewed label Nov 13, 2025
@Godelaine Godelaine added next-release This issue or pull request should be resolved before next release and removed Release 03/2026 next-release This issue or pull request should be resolved before next release labels Nov 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: CHEN Roxane <[email protected]>
@RoxaneChen02 RoxaneChen02 added PR: ready-to-be-merged This PR is waiting to be merged and removed PR: waiting-for-review This PR is waiting to be reviewed labels Nov 26, 2025
@RoxaneChen02 RoxaneChen02 changed the title feat: add PTDF Sensitivities in Ampere (function type: BRANCH_CURRENT and variable type: INJECTION_ACTIVE_POWER) feat(ptdf sensi): add PTDF Sensitivities in Ampere (function type: BRANCH_CURRENT and variable type: INJECTION_ACTIVE_POWER) Nov 26, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR: ready-to-be-merged This PR is waiting to be merged

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow computing PTDFs in AMPERE

4 participants