Update provider_service.py

[dhirenmathur]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the status of the "O4 mini" model under the OpenAI provider so it is no longer marked as an inference model.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The change updates the metadata for the "O4 mini" model in the OpenAI provider by setting its is_inference_model attribute from True to False. This adjustment alters how the model is categorized within the application's available models list.

Changes

File	Change Summary
app/modules/intelligence/provider/provider_service.py	Updated is_inference_model to False for "openai/o4-mini" model.

Poem

In the warren of models, a flag was switched,
"O4 mini" hopped from inference, its status now ditched.
With a flick of a bit, the metadata’s new,
The rabbits all cheer for this change in the queue.
🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 213eaf0 and f020814.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• app/modules/intelligence/provider/provider_service.py (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

app/modules/intelligence/provider/provider_service.py (1)

276-282: Verify the model classification change aligns with capabilities.

The "O4 mini" model is being reclassified from is_inference_model=True to is_inference_model=False. This creates a potential inconsistency since:

1. The name contains "mini" which typically indicates smaller, faster models suited for inference
2. Other "mini" models in the list (e.g., "GPT-4.1 Mini" on line 268-274) have is_inference_model=True

However, since this is described as a "reasoning model", it may have different characteristics that justify this classification.

Please verify that this change aligns with the model's actual capabilities and intended use case. If the model prioritizes reasoning over speed despite the "mini" designation, this classification would be appropriate.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any documentation or references to O4 mini model capabilities
# Expected: Find context about whether O4 mini is primarily a reasoning model vs inference model

# Search for any documentation or comments about O4 mini
rg -i "o4.mini|o4-mini" -A 3 -B 3

# Search for patterns around reasoning vs inference model distinctions
rg -i "reasoning.model|inference.model" -A 2 -B 2

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud