feat: Generate Unit Tests for CodeProviderService #398
Conversation
WalkthroughA new test module has been introduced for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestSuite
participant CodeProviderService
participant GithubService
participant LocalRepoService
TestSuite->>CodeProviderService: Initialize (with isDevelopmentMode)
alt Development Mode
CodeProviderService->>LocalRepoService: Use for operations
else Production Mode
CodeProviderService->>GithubService: Use for operations
end
TestSuite->>CodeProviderService: Call get_repo / get_project_structure_async / get_file_content
CodeProviderService->>LocalRepoService: Delegate (if dev)
CodeProviderService->>GithubService: Delegate (if prod)
LocalRepoService-->>CodeProviderService: Return result or raise exception
GithubService-->>CodeProviderService: Return result or raise exception
CodeProviderService-->>TestSuite: Return result or propagate exception
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (2)
96-106: Good async edge case testThe async test for getting project structure with an invalid ID is well-structured, but could use the same assertion improvement as the previous test.
@pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_get_project_structure_async_invalid_id(self, mock_sql_db, mock_github_service): with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled"}): mock_github_service.get_project_structure_async.side_effect = Exception("Project not found") service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) service.service_instance = mock_github_service with pytest.raises(Exception) as exc_info: await service.get_project_structure_async("invalid-id") - assert str(exc_info.value) == "Project not found" + # Make sure the assertion matches the exact exception message + assert "Project not found" in str(exc_info.value)
1-123: Add test coverage for specific exceptionsThe current tests are using generic Exception classes. Consider adding tests for specific exceptions that the services might throw, such as HTTPException.
from fastapi import HTTPException def test_http_exception_propagation(self, mock_sql_db): """Test that HTTPException is correctly propagated""" with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled"}): mock_service = Mock(spec=GithubService) mock_service.get_repo.side_effect = HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Repository not found") service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) service.service_instance = mock_service with pytest.raises(HTTPException) as exc_info: service.get_repo("invalid-repo") assert exc_info.value.status_code == 404 assert exc_info.value.detail == "Repository not found"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (3)
app/modules/code_provider/code_provider_service.py (1)
CodeProviderService(8-30)app/modules/code_provider/github/github_service.py (1)
GithubService(28-751)app/modules/code_provider/local_repo/local_repo_service.py (1)
LocalRepoService(17-338)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (5)
1-7: Good job with the imports!All necessary imports are present for the test file, including both the module under test (CodeProviderService) and its dependencies (GithubService, LocalRepoService).
8-11: LGTM - Appropriate SQL DB mock setupThe SQL DB mock fixture is correctly defined and will be used by both service mocks.
30-36: Initialization test in development mode looks goodThe test correctly verifies that the service instance is a LocalRepoService when isDevelopmentMode is "enabled".
37-42: Initialization test in production mode looks goodThe test correctly verifies that the service instance is a GithubService when isDevelopmentMode is "disabled".
85-95:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect assertion in edge case test
The error message in the assertion doesn't match the exception being raised.
# Cover Edge Cases def test_get_repo_with_invalid_name(self, mock_sql_db, mock_github_service): with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled"}): mock_github_service.get_repo.side_effect = Exception("Repository not found") service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) service.service_instance = mock_github_service with pytest.raises(Exception) as exc_info: service.get_repo("invalid-repo") - assert str(exc_info.value) == "Repository not found" + # Make sure the assertion matches the exact exception message + assert "Repository not found" in str(exc_info.value)Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (5)
28-30: Mock return values don't match actual service implementationThe mock GithubService's
get_repomethod is returning a dictionary, but according to previous review comments, it should return a tuple of (Github, Repository).Apply this fix:
- service.get_repo.return_value = {"name": "test-repo", "id": 1} + # Return a tuple of (Github, Repository) as the actual implementation does + github_mock = Mock() + repo_mock = Mock() + service.get_repo.return_value = (github_mock, repo_mock)
45-58: Missing test for default behavior when environment variable is not setThere is no test to verify what happens when the
isDevelopmentModeenvironment variable is missing.Consider adding this test:
def test_init_default_mode(self, mock_sql_db): """Test initialization when isDevelopmentMode is not set""" with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=True): # Clear all env vars with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github: mock_github.return_value = Mock(spec=GithubService) service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) # Verify default behavior (should use GithubService) assert isinstance(service.service_instance, GithubService)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
46-47: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
53-54: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
59-80: Improve the get_repo testThis test has several issues:
- The
resultvariable is assigned but never used- The if-else block has identical assertions
- The test doesn't verify argument passing or the return value
- Nested with statements can be simplified
Apply these improvements:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_dev_mode,service_class,mock_service", [ ("enabled", LocalRepoService, "app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService"), ("disabled", GithubService, "app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") ]) def test_get_repo(self, mock_sql_db, is_dev_mode, service_class, mock_service, mock_local_repo_service, mock_github_service): env_vars = {"isDevelopmentMode": is_dev_mode} if is_dev_mode == "disabled": env_vars["GH_TOKEN_LIST"] = "demo-token" - with patch.dict(os.environ, env_vars): - with patch(mock_service) as mock_service_class: + with patch.dict(os.environ, env_vars), patch(mock_service) as mock_service_class: mock_instance = mock_local_repo_service if is_dev_mode == "enabled" else mock_github_service mock_service_class.return_value = mock_instance service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) repo_name = "test-repo" result = service.get_repo(repo_name) - if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_repo.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_repo.called + # Verify the method was called with correct parameters + mock_instance.get_repo.assert_called_once_with(repo_name) + # Verify the result is correct + assert result == mock_instance.get_repo.return_value🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
68-69: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
74-74: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
81-104: Improve the async project structure testThis test has similar issues to the get_repo test:
- The
resultvariable is assigned but never used- The if-else block has identical assertions
- The test doesn't verify argument passing or the return value
- Nested with statements can be simplified
Apply these improvements:
@pytest.mark.asyncio @pytest.mark.parametrize("is_dev_mode,service_class,mock_service", [ ("enabled", LocalRepoService, "app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService"), ("disabled", GithubService, "app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") ]) async def test_get_project_structure_async(self, mock_sql_db, is_dev_mode, service_class, mock_service, mock_local_repo_service, mock_github_service): env_vars = {"isDevelopmentMode": is_dev_mode} if is_dev_mode == "disabled": env_vars["GH_TOKEN_LIST"] = "demo-token" - with patch.dict(os.environ, env_vars): - with patch(mock_service) as mock_service_class: + with patch.dict(os.environ, env_vars), patch(mock_service) as mock_service_class: mock_instance = mock_local_repo_service if is_dev_mode == "enabled" else mock_github_service mock_service_class.return_value = mock_instance service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) + project_id = "123" + path = "test/path" - result = await service.get_project_structure_async("123", "test/path") + result = await service.get_project_structure_async(project_id, path) - if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.called + # Verify the method was called with correct parameters + mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.assert_called_once_with(project_id, path) + # Verify the result is correct + assert result == mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.return_value🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
92-93: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
98-98: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
105-134: Improve the file content testThis test has similar issues to the previous tests:
- The
resultvariable is assigned but never used- The if-else block has identical assertions
- The test doesn't verify argument passing or the return value
- Nested with statements can be simplified
Apply these improvements:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("is_dev_mode,service_class,mock_service", [ ("enabled", LocalRepoService, "app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService"), ("disabled", GithubService, "app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") ]) def test_get_file_content(self, mock_sql_db, is_dev_mode, service_class, mock_service, mock_local_repo_service, mock_github_service): env_vars = {"isDevelopmentMode": is_dev_mode} if is_dev_mode == "disabled": env_vars["GH_TOKEN_LIST"] = "demo-token" - with patch.dict(os.environ, env_vars): - with patch(mock_service) as mock_service_class: + with patch.dict(os.environ, env_vars), patch(mock_service) as mock_service_class: mock_instance = mock_local_repo_service if is_dev_mode == "enabled" else mock_github_service mock_service_class.return_value = mock_instance service = CodeProviderService(mock_sql_db) + repo_name = "test-repo" + file_path = "test/file.py" + start_line = 1 + end_line = 10 + branch_name = "main" + project_id = "123" result = service.get_file_content( - repo_name="test-repo", - file_path="test/file.py", - start_line=1, - end_line=10, - branch_name="main", - project_id="123" + repo_name=repo_name, + file_path=file_path, + start_line=start_line, + end_line=end_line, + branch_name=branch_name, + project_id=project_id ) - if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_file_content.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_file_content.called + # Verify the method was called with correct parameters + mock_instance.get_file_content.assert_called_once_with( + repo_name, file_path, start_line, end_line, branch_name, project_id + ) + # Verify the result is correct + assert result == mock_instance.get_file_content.return_value🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
115-116: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
121-121: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (6)
37-37: Mock return value could be more specificUsing
MagicMock()is better than a dictionary, but it would be clearer to specify that it's mocking a git.Repo object to match the actual implementation.- service.get_repo.return_value = MagicMock() + # Return a git.Repo object as the actual implementation does + repo_mock = Mock(spec='git.Repo') + service.get_repo.return_value = repo_mock
46-47: Simplify nested with statementsThe nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "enabled"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService") as mock_local: + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "enabled"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService") as mock_local:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
46-47: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
53-54: Simplify nested with statementsThe nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github: + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
53-54: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
136-137: Simplify nested with statementsThe nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github: + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
136-137: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
149-150: Simplify nested with statementsThe nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github: + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
149-150: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
161-162: Simplify nested with statementsThe nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github: + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
161-162: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py
46-47: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
53-54: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
68-69: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
74-74: Local variable result is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable result
(F841)
92-93: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
98-98: Local variable result is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable result
(F841)
115-116: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
121-121: Local variable result is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable result
(F841)
136-137: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
149-150: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
161-162: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (3)
53-59: Combine nested with statements for better readability.Similar to the previous test, the nested
withstatements can be combined.- def test_init_production_mode(self, mock_sql_db): - with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github: + def test_init_production_mode(self, mock_sql_db): + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "disabled", "GH_TOKEN_LIST": "demo-token"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.GithubService") as mock_github:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
54-55: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
166-189: Same issues with redundant logic and unused result in async test.The same issues appear in this async test as in the previous test.
- result = await service.get_project_structure_async("123", "test/path") - - if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.called + result = await service.get_project_structure_async("123", "test/path") + assert mock_instance.get_project_structure_async.called + assert result == {"files": [], "directories": []} # Add a meaningful assertion🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
177-178: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
183-183: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
190-219: Same issues with redundant logic and unused result in file content test.The issues with redundant conditional logic and unused result also appear in this test.
- result = service.get_file_content( + result = service.get_file_content( repo_name="test-repo", file_path="test/file.py", start_line=1, end_line=10, branch_name="main", project_id="123" ) - if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_file_content.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_file_content.called + assert mock_instance.get_file_content.called + assert result == "test content" # Add a meaningful assertion🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
200-201: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
206-206: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (3)
46-52: Combine nested with statements for better readability.The nested
withstatements can be combined into a single statement to improve code readability.- def test_init_development_mode(self, mock_sql_db): - with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "enabled"}): - with patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService") as mock_local: + def test_init_development_mode(self, mock_sql_db): + with patch.dict(os.environ, {"isDevelopmentMode": "enabled"}), \ + patch("app.modules.code_provider.code_provider_service.LocalRepoService") as mock_local:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
47-48: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
144-165: Simplify redundant conditional logic in test assertions.The conditional logic in the assertions is redundant since both branches perform the same assertion.
- if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_repo.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_repo.called + assert mock_instance.get_repo.calledAlso, the result variable is assigned but never used:
- result = service.get_repo("test-repo") + service.get_repo("test-repo")Or better yet, use the result in your assertion:
- result = service.get_repo("test-repo") - - if is_dev_mode == "enabled": - assert mock_instance.get_repo.called - else: - assert mock_instance.get_repo.called + result = service.get_repo("test-repo") + assert mock_instance.get_repo.called + assert result is not None # Add a meaningful assertion about the result🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
153-154: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
159-159: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
245-262: Ensure assertion message matches the expected exception message.The test asserts for a specific exception message. For better resilience in case error messages change, consider checking that the message contains certain keywords instead of an exact match.
- assert str(exc_info.value) == "File not found" + assert "File not found" in str(exc_info.value)Also, consider combining the nested
withstatements as previously suggested.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
246-247: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py
47-48: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
54-55: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
62-63: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
70-71: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
78-79: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
153-154: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
159-159: Local variable result is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable result
(F841)
177-178: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
183-183: Local variable result is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable result
(F841)
200-201: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
206-206: Local variable result is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable result
(F841)
221-222: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
234-235: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
246-247: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/modules/code_provider/tests/code_provider_service_test.py (8)
9-42: Good test fixture setup with clear mock return values.The fixtures are well-defined and provide the necessary mocks for testing. The
mock_github_serviceandmock_local_repo_serviceare properly configured with appropriate return values that match the expected types.
60-84: Good edge case testing for environment variables.The test cases effectively verify behavior with missing or invalid environment variables. This is an excellent addition that ensures the service behaves correctly in various initialization scenarios.
You could simplify the code by combining the nested
withstatements as previously suggested.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
62-63: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
70-71: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
78-79: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
85-107: Excellent tests for service method argument passing.These tests ensure that the service correctly passes arguments to the underlying service instance, which is crucial for proper delegation.
108-119: Good async test for argument passing.The async test properly verifies that arguments are passed correctly to the async method.
120-143: Comprehensive exception handling tests.The tests cover different types of exceptions (HTTPException, ValueError, and generic Exception), ensuring proper propagation of these exceptions from the service instance.
220-231: Good test for invalid repository name edge case.This test properly checks the behavior when an invalid repository name is provided.
Consider combining the nested
withstatements as previously suggested.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
221-222: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
232-244: Good async test for invalid project ID edge case.This test correctly verifies behavior when an invalid project ID is provided to the async method.
Consider combining the nested
withstatements as previously suggested.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
234-235: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
1-262: Overall excellent test coverage for CodeProviderService.The test suite provides comprehensive coverage for the CodeProviderService, including initialization in different modes, method delegation, argument passing, and exception handling. It uses parameterized testing effectively to reduce code duplication and covers important edge cases.
A few minor suggestions for improvement:
- Add tests for additional edge cases, such as what happens when services return unexpected data formats
- Consider testing with more diverse input values
- Add docstrings to test methods to better document what each test is verifying
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
47-48: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
54-55: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
62-63: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
70-71: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
78-79: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
153-154: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
159-159: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
177-178: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
183-183: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
200-201: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
206-206: Local variable
resultis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
result(F841)
221-222: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
234-235: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
246-247: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
1 participant
Description
Summary by CodeRabbit