Skip to content

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #21692

First-time contributors' checklist

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

According to the discussion with @JmPotato , the current implementation of LOCATION LABELS is not correct and may acts does not meet the user want. Fixing the behavior requires manpower, and there is currently no plan or demand from users. So just add warnings about it.

For example, if the user set LOCATION LABELS with the similar string as placement-rule-in-SQL does: https://docs.pingcap.com/zh/tidb/stable/placement-rules-in-sql/#%E6%8C%87%E5%AE%9A%E7%94%9F%E5%AD%98%E5%81%8F%E5%A5%BD

alter table t set tiflash replica 2 LOCATION LABELS "[region, zone, host]"

then the generated placement-rule in PD is

  {
    "group_id": "tiflash",
    ...
    "start_key": "748000000000055fff795f720000000000fa",
    "end_key": "748000000000055fff7a00000000000000f8",
    "role": "learner",
    "count": 2,
    "label_constraints": [
      {
        "key": "engine",
        "op": "in",
        "values": ["tiflash"]
      }
    ],
    "location_labels": [
      "[region, zone, host]"
    ],
  }

but not

  {
    "group_id": "tiflash",
    ...
    "start_key": "748000000000055fff795f720000000000fa",
    "end_key": "748000000000055fff7a00000000000000f8",
    "role": "learner",
    "count": 2,
    "label_constraints": [
      {
        "key": "engine",
        "op": "in",
        "values": ["tiflash"]
      }
    ],
    "location_labels": [
      "region",
      "zone",
      "host"
    ],
  }

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

Tips for choosing the affected version(s):

By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.

For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions (in Chinese).

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v9.0 (TiDB 9.0 versions)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR. labels Sep 1, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the TiFlash replica documentation to address a known limitation with the LOCATION LABELS clause in ALTER TABLE ... SET TIFLASH REPLICA statements. It removes misleading examples and adds a clear warning to prevent users from encountering unexpected behavior. Additionally, it enhances the verification process for replica distribution by providing direct SQL queries.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update for TiFlash Replicas: Clarified the usage of ALTER TABLE ... SET TIFLASH REPLICA by removing the LOCATION LABELS clause from examples, as it currently does not function as expected for multiple labels.
  • Warning on LOCATION LABELS: Added a prominent note warning users that LOCATION LABELS in ALTER TABLE ... SET TIFLASH REPLICA cannot correctly parse multiple labels, advising against its use for this purpose.
  • Improved Replica Verification: Replaced the pd-ctl command with new SQL queries in the documentation, providing a more user-friendly way to verify the distribution of TiFlash replicas for both partitioned and non-partitioned tables.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation to warn users against using LOCATION LABELS when setting TiFlash replicas, as its implementation is incorrect. The changes remove the usage of LOCATION LABELS from examples and add an explicit warning note. The verification method is also updated from pd-ctl to a more convenient SQL query. My review provides suggestions to make the example SQL queries more robust and generic for users.

@hfxsd
Copy link
Collaborator

hfxsd commented Sep 1, 2025

/approve

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Sep 1, 2025
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 3b4ce7a into pingcap:release-7.5 Sep 1, 2025
9 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the cherry-pick-21692-to-release-7.5 branch September 1, 2025 01:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants