chore(deps-dev): update chalk requirement from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2

[dependabot]

Updates the requirements on chalk to permit the latest version.

Release notes

Sourced from chalk's releases.

v5.6.2

• Fix vulnerability in 5.6.1, see: chalk/chalk#656

Commits

• 5155778 5.6.2
• 5c91505 5.6.0
• a8f5bf7 Make WezTerm terminal use true color
• See full diff in compare view

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Note
Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
vanity	Ready	Preview	Comment	Oct 25, 2025 3:23pm

[claude]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: Missing GitHub secret requires repository admin configuration**

What I found

All four investigators agree:

1. The actual error: Environment variable validation failed: Either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is required when using direct Anthropic API.

2. What's happening: The claude-code-review.yml workflow runs on every PR (including Dependabot PRs). It uses anthropics/claude-code-action@beta and expects a CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret to be configured in the repository settings. That secret either doesn't exist or is empty.

3. The chalk update is innocent: The PR just bumps chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2 (a patch version with a security fix). This is a totally normal dependency update and has nothing to do with the CI failure.

4. The workflow config looks like this:

   with:
     claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}

   When that secret isn't set, GitHub passes an empty string, and the action rightfully rejects it.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: Missing repository secrets**

What I found

This is pretty clear from the logs:

### What needs to happen
This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---
*🤖 Generated by [kaylee](https://github.com/misty-step/kaylee) — I tried, Captain!*

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes.**

What I found

Root Cause

Missing GitHub repository secret: CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is not configured, causing the claude-code-action to fail during PR review.

Fix

UNFIXABLE with code changes.

This CI failure is caused by a missing repository secret, not a code issue. The anthropics/claude-code-action@beta GitHub Action requires either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN to be set as a repository secret, but neither is configured.

The PR itself (updating chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2) is perfectly fine - it's a straightforward dev dependency bump. The failure is in the Claude Code Review workflow, which runs on PR open/sync events and needs authentication to call the Anthropic API.

To fix this, the repo owner needs to:

1. Go to GitHub repository Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
2. Add a secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN (or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY)
3. Set it to a valid token from Anthropic

This is not something I can fix with code changes - it requires access to repository secrets which is an admin-level configuration outside the codebase.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: via code** - This requires a repository administrator to:

What I found

Now I have full confirmation. The CI failure is due to a missing GitHub secret (CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN), not anything in the code.

Root Cause

The CI failure is NOT fixable with code changes. The anthropics/claude-code-action@beta GitHub Action requires either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN to be set as a repository secret. The workflow at .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml references ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}, but this secret hasn't been configured in the repository settings.

Fix

UNFIXABLE via code - This requires a repository administrator to:

1. Go to Repository Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
2. Add a new secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN with a valid Anthropic OAuth token

The PR itself (updating chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2) is a simple, safe dev dependency update that won't cause any issues. The CI failure is unrelated to the PR's changes - it's a pre-existing configuration problem with the Claude Code Review workflow that would affect any PR to this repository.

This is not something I can fix by editing files - it requires external secret/token configuration in GitHub's repository settings.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes.**

What I found

Now I understand the full picture.

Root Cause

The CI failure is NOT a code issue. The claude-code-review.yml workflow fails because the repository doesn't have the CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret configured. This is an external configuration issue - the workflow references ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }} but that secret doesn't exist in the repository.

The actual PR (updating chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2 in package.json) is perfectly valid - it's a dev dependency update that fixes a vulnerability as noted in the PR description.

Fix

UNFIXABLE with code changes.

This requires the repository owner to either:

1. Add the CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret to the repository settings, OR
2. Add the ANTHROPIC_API_KEY secret instead, OR
3. Remove/disable the claude-code-review.yml workflow if they don't want Claude Code reviews

The chalk dependency update in this PR is correct and working. The failing CI job (claude-review) is a misconfigured GitHub Action that needs secrets to be set up - this is not something that can be fixed by editing code in the repository.

The main CI workflow (build-and-test, security_scan) would run separately and those are the ones that actually test/build the code. The logs provided only show the claude-code-review workflow which is an optional code review automation.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: via code changes.** This is a secrets/configuration issue that requires:

What I found

Based on my investigation with all four subagents, I have a clear picture of what's happening.

Root Cause

Missing GitHub Secret: The CI failure is due to CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN not being configured in the repository's GitHub Actions secrets. This is NOT a code issue.

Fix

UNFIXABLE via code changes. This is a secrets/configuration issue that requires:

1. A repository administrator to go to Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
2. Add a secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN with a valid Claude Code OAuth token
3. (Alternatively, they could add ANTHROPIC_API_KEY)

The actual PR (updating chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2) is perfectly fine - it's a safe patch-level dependency update. The failure is in the Claude Code Review workflow (claude-code-review.yml) which requires an API token to run, but no token is configured.

Evidence from logs:

##[error]Action failed with error: Error: Environment variable validation failed:
  - Either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is required when using direct Anthropic API.

The dependency update itself would pass all other CI checks (linting, testing, building). It's only the optional Claude Code Review that's failing due to missing secrets configuration.

Recommendation to repository maintainer: Configure the CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret in your GitHub repository settings, or remove/disable the claude-code-review workflow if you don't want AI-powered code reviews.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes.**

What I found

Well, that's pretty clear cut. Looking at all four investigations, they all point to the same thing:

Root Cause

The CI failure is not a code issue - it's a missing GitHub secret (CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN). The anthropics/claude-code-action@beta workflow is failing because the repository doesn't have the required CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY secret configured.

Fix

UNFIXABLE with code changes.

This is a configuration issue that requires the repository owner to:

1. Go to Repository Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
2. Add a repository secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN (obtained from Anthropic/Claude)
3. Or alternatively configure ANTHROPIC_API_KEY

The PR itself (updating chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2 in package.json) is completely fine - it's a simple dev dependency version bump with no breaking changes. The chalk library is used in 5 CLI command files for terminal output styling, and all the API calls (chalk.cyan(), chalk.bold(), etc.) are stable across these versions.

The CI failure is happening in the claude-code-review workflow step that tries to run the Claude Code Action to auto-review PRs, but fails before it can even start because the authentication token isn't configured in the repo's secrets.

---

Nothing I can edit or commit here - this needs the repo admin to set up the GitHub secret. The dependabot PR itself is ready to merge once that's configured.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes.**

What I found

Root Cause

The CI failure is NOT fixable with code changes. The claude-code-review.yml workflow requires a CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret that is not configured in the GitHub repository settings. This is a missing secrets/external configuration issue, not a code bug.

Analysis Summary

All four investigators agree:

1. Log Analysis: The error Either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is required when using direct Anthropic API indicates missing authentication credentials
2. Diff Analysis: The chalk dependency bump from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2 is completely unrelated to the CI failure - it's just terminal styling
3. History Search: The workflow files reference ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }} but the secret hasn't been configured in the repo
4. Test Trace: This is a configuration issue at the GitHub repository level, not a code issue

Fix

UNFIXABLE with code changes.

To fix this, someone with repository admin access needs to:

1. Go to GitHub repository Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
2. Add a new repository secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN
3. Set the value to a valid Claude Code OAuth token from Anthropic

The PR itself (updating chalk from 5.5.0 to 5.6.2) is a valid, safe dependency update. The CI failure is caused by the Claude Code Review action being unable to authenticate because the required secret is missing from the repository configuration.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes**. The error:

What I found

All four agents have returned. The diagnosis is clear:

Root Cause

The CI failure is NOT related to the code changes (chalk version bump from 5.5.0 to 5.6.2). The failure is due to a missing GitHub secret: CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is not configured in the repository settings, but the claude-code-review.yml workflow requires it.

Fix

This is UNFIXABLE with code changes. The error:

Error: Environment variable validation failed:
  - Either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is required when using direct Anthropic API.

This requires the repository owner to:

1. Go to GitHub repository Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
2. Add a secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN with a valid Claude Code OAuth token

The actual PR (dependabot bump of chalk from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2) is completely fine and safe - it's a minor version bump of a dev dependency with no breaking changes.

---

Summary

Root Cause: Missing CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN GitHub secret - the claude-code-review workflow cannot authenticate with Anthropic's API.

Fix: Cannot be fixed with code. The repository owner must add the CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret to the GitHub repository settings. The chalk dependency update itself is safe and not the cause of the failure.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes.**

What I found

Well shiny, that's clear as day. All four agents are pointing to the same thing - this ain't a code problem, it's a missing secret.

Root Cause

The CI failed because CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret is not configured in the GitHub repository settings. The anthropics/claude-code-action@beta action requires either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN to authenticate with Anthropic's API.

Fix

UNFIXABLE with code changes.

This is a repository configuration issue, not a code problem. The chalk dependency update from ^5.5.0 to ^5.6.2 is completely unrelated to the failure - that's just a simple patch version bump for a terminal coloring library.

The actual failure is in the claude-code-review.yml workflow which tries to use:

claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}

But that secret doesn't exist in the repository.

To fix this, a repository administrator needs to:

1. Go to the GitHub repository settings
2. Navigate to Secrets and variables → Actions
3. Create a new secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN with a valid token from Anthropic

The main CI pipeline (ci.yml) that runs tests and linting doesn't require this secret and would pass fine. It's only the Claude code review automation that's failing, and that's optional functionality that requires the repo owner to set up the external service credentials.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!

[phrazzld]

🔧 kaylee here!

I took a look at the failing CI, but this one's beyond my wrench:

Why I can't fix it: with code changes.**

What I found

Root Cause

Missing CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY GitHub secret — this is a CI/CD configuration issue, not a code bug.

Fix

UNFIXABLE with code changes.

All four investigators agree:

1. The error is "Either ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is required when using direct Anthropic API"
2. This comes from the claude-code-review.yml workflow which uses anthropics/claude-code-action@beta
3. The workflow requires a GitHub secret (secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN) that hasn't been configured in the repository
4. The PR itself (chalk ^5.5.0 → ^5.6.2) is completely unrelated to this failure — it's just a devDependency version bump

The fix requires someone with repository admin access to:

1. Go to GitHub Repository Settings > Secrets and variables > Actions
2. Add a secret named CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN with a valid token from Anthropic

This is not something I can fix with code edits — it's external configuration that needs to be set up in GitHub's web interface.

What needs to happen

This likely requires human intervention — maybe setting up secrets, configuring external services, or other non-code changes.

---

🤖 Generated by kaylee — I tried, Captain!