Skip to content

Conversation

@GaoNeng-wWw
Copy link
Collaborator

@GaoNeng-wWw GaoNeng-wWw commented Nov 30, 2025

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Infrastructure
    • Adjusted container volume and runtime path mappings and updated shell script to use explicit relative script paths for consistent startup behavior.
  • Database
    • Added a migration to create a new application table for storing application metadata (id, name, description, icon, tag, classify).

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates Docker volume mappings and a Dockerfile VOLUME path to reference /builder/dist/data, makes script path references explicit/relative in the start script (./migrate.js, ./dist/main.js) and adds a new TypeORM migration that creates an application table with id, name, description, icon, tag, and classify columns.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docker & Build paths
template/nestJs/docker-compose.yml, template/nestJs/dockerfile
Changed volume and VOLUME mappings to point at builder path (./data:/builder/dist/data in compose and /builder/dist/data in Dockerfile)
Startup script
template/nestJs/endpoint.sh
Added shebang, adjusted script invocations to use explicit relative paths (./migrate.js, ./dist/main.js)
Database Migration
template/nestJs/migrations/1764502806299-TinyPro.js
Added a new TypeORM migration class TinyPro1764502806240 that creates an application table (id PK auto-increment; name, description, icon, tag, classify as varchar(255) NOT NULL) and a down method to drop it

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Review attention recommended for:
    • template/nestJs/migrations/1764502806299-TinyPro.js — confirm timestamp vs class name consistency and SQL correctness.
    • template/nestJs/dockerfile and docker-compose.yml — ensure volume paths match runtime build layout and container user permissions.
    • template/nestJs/endpoint.sh — verify relative paths work in the container entry context and shebang is appropriate.

Poem

🐰
I hopped through Docker, tiny paws in tow,
Moved carrots from APP to builder row by row,
Scripts now point plainly, no mystery to chase,
A new table sprouts in the database space,
Happy hops — build and migrate, at steady pace!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix(nest.js): add lose migrations' is vague and contains a likely typo ('lose' instead of 'missing'/'lost'). While it references migrations, it fails to clearly describe what the actual changes accomplish. Clarify the title to accurately describe the changes. Consider: 'fix(nest.js): add missing NestJS migrations' or 'fix(nest.js): add TypeORM migrations for application table'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9aeaae5 and 3de8df3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • template/nestJs/endpoint.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
template/nestJs/endpoint.sh (1)

1-3: LGTM! Shebang added and paths made explicit.

The addition of the #!/bin/sh shebang resolves the previous ShellCheck warning and ensures predictable shell behavior. The explicit relative paths (./migrate.js and ./dist/main.js) improve portability and clarity in the script. The command sequencing and functionality remain correct.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 30, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c30341b and 9aeaae5.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • template/nestJs/docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
  • template/nestJs/dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • template/nestJs/endpoint.sh (1 hunks)
  • template/nestJs/migrations/1764502806299-TinyPro.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck (0.11.0)
template/nestJs/endpoint.sh

[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.

(SC2148)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e-test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
template/nestJs/dockerfile (1)

26-26: LGTM! Volume path now aligns with WORKDIR.

The updated VOLUME path correctly references /builder/dist/data, which is consistent with the WORKDIR /builder/ set on line 2 and the volume mapping in docker-compose.yml.

template/nestJs/docker-compose.yml (1)

33-33: LGTM! Volume mapping now consistent with dockerfile.

The updated volume mapping correctly references /builder/dist/data, fixing the previous inconsistency where it pointed to /APP/dist/data while the dockerfile uses /builder/ as WORKDIR.

@GaoNeng-wWw GaoNeng-wWw marked this pull request as draft November 30, 2025 12:57
@GaoNeng-wWw GaoNeng-wWw marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2025 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant