Skip to content

Conversation

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor

@jmguzik jmguzik commented Nov 4, 2025

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Guzik <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from liangxia and smg247 November 4, 2025 08:30
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 4, 2025
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Nov 4, 2025

/test e2e

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Walkthrough

A comment line was modified in the config_watcher.go file, specifically altering the RepoItem struct comment. No functional changes were introduced—this is purely a comment-level modification with no impact on types, methods, or control flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Comment modification
cmd/pipeline-controller/config_watcher.go
Updated RepoItem struct comment from standard description to modified version

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Comment-only change with no functional, behavioral, or structural impact
  • No logic modifications or declaration changes requiring detailed analysis
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbc08f2 and 6d5d12c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/pipeline-controller/config_watcher.go (1 hunks)

)

// RepoItem represents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
// RepoItem r epresents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix typographical error in comment.

The comment contains a typo: "r epresents" should be "represents".

-// RepoItem r  epresents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
+// RepoItem represents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// RepoItem r epresents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
// RepoItem represents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In cmd/pipeline-controller/config_watcher.go around line 12, the comment has a
typographical error: "r  epresents" should be corrected to "represents"; update
the comment text to remove the extra space and fix the spelling so it reads
"RepoItem represents a repository configuration that can be either a string or
an object."

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Nov 4, 2025

/override images
/override checkconfig
/override integration

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@jmguzik: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • checkconfig
  • images
  • integration

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • CodeRabbit
  • ci/prow/breaking-changes
  • ci/prow/checkconfig
  • ci/prow/codegen
  • ci/prow/e2e
  • ci/prow/format
  • ci/prow/frontend-checks
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/integration
  • ci/prow/integration-optional-test
  • ci/prow/lint
  • ci/prow/security
  • ci/prow/unit
  • ci/prow/validate-vendor
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-breaking-changes
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-checkconfig
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-format
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-frontend-checks
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-integration
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-integration-optional-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-validate-vendor
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override images
/override checkconfig
/override integration

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Nov 4, 2025

/override ci/prow/checkconfig
/override ci/prow/images

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/checkconfig, ci/prow/images

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/checkconfig
/override ci/prow/images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Nov 4, 2025

/override ci/prow/breaking-changes

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/breaking-changes

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/breaking-changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test integration-optional-test

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test integration-optional-test

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test integration-optional-test

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Tests from second stage were triggered manually. Pipeline can be controlled only manually, until HEAD changes. Use pipeline required to trigger second stage.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Tests from second stage were triggered manually. Pipeline can be controlled only manually, until HEAD changes. Use pipeline required to trigger second stage.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test integration-optional-test

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Tests from second stage were triggered manually. Pipeline can be controlled only manually, until HEAD changes. Use / pipeline required to trigger second stage.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 5, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 5, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Tests from second stage were triggered manually. Pipeline can be controlled only manually, until HEAD changes. Use command to trigger second stage.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jmguzik, openshift-merge-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test integration-optional-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 5, 2025

@jmguzik: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e 6d5d12c link true /test e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants