Test dnm 3

[jmguzik]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A minor formatting adjustment to the public comment for the RepoItem type in the config watcher. The type signature, struct definition, and UnmarshalYAML logic remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Comment formatting cmd/pipeline-controller/config_watcher.go	Extra space added in the public comment for the RepoItem type; no functional changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The pull request title 'Test dnm 3' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that do not convey meaningful information about the changeset. The summary shows only a minor formatting change to a comment in config_watcher.go, but the title does not reference this change or clearly indicate what was modified.	Revise the pull request title to be more descriptive and specific to the actual changes. A better title would reference the specific file and the nature of the change, such as 'Fix formatting in RepoItem comment in config_watcher.go' or similar, so that reviewers can quickly understand the purpose of the PR.
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author. While this is a very lenient check that should pass with any related description, the complete absence of a description makes it impossible to verify that there is any explanation or context for the changes.	Add a pull request description that explains the purpose and context of the changes. Even for minor formatting updates, a brief description helps reviewers understand why the change was made and what problem it addresses or prevents.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jmguzik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jmguzik]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

cmd/pipeline-controller/config_watcher.go (1)

12-12: Minor: Double space in comment.

There's an extra space between RepoItem and represents. Consider removing it for consistency with Go comment conventions.

-// RepoItem  represents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object
+// RepoItem represents a repository configuration that can be either a string or an object

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ddda341 and 2849e90.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• cmd/pipeline-controller/config_watcher.go (1 hunks)

[openshift-ci]

@jmguzik: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/breaking-changes	2849e90	link	false	/test breaking-changes
ci/prow/images	2849e90	link	true	/test images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.