Skip to content

Conversation

@jgyselov
Copy link
Contributor

@jgyselov jgyselov commented Sep 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated reviewer roster to include an additional maintainer, improving review coverage.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jgyselov: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 18, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 18, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a single reviewer entry (LiorSoffer) to the reviewers list in the OWNERS file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Ownership config
OWNERS
Appended LiorSoffer to the reviewers list; no removals or structural changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

lgtm

Suggested reviewers

  • ammont82
  • celdrake

Poem

A nibble of names in the OWNERS row,
I hop and stamp—another to show!
LiorSoffer joins the warren’s queue,
Reviews will sprout like morning dew.
Thump-thump—approvals on the go! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "NO-ISSUE: Edit OWNERS file" directly and concisely describes the primary change in the PR (an edit to the OWNERS file adding a reviewer), is a short single sentence, and is clear for a reviewer scanning history. It does not include irrelevant file lists, emojis, or vague terms, and therefore meets the guideline for being related and specific. The "NO-ISSUE:" prefix is mildly extraneous but not misleading.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jgyselov jgyselov marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2025 13:20
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Sep 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 18, 2025

The following users are mentioned in OWNERS file(s) but are untrusted for the following reasons. One way to make the user trusted is to add them as members of the openshift-assisted org. You can then trigger verification by writing /verify-owners in a comment.

  • LiorSoffer
    • User is not a member of the org. User is not a collaborator. Satisfy at least one of these conditions to make the user trusted.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 18, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ammont82 and asmasarw September 18, 2025 13:20
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
OWNERS (1)

9-18: Nit: consider keeping reviewers alphabetized

For maintainability, consider alphabetizing the reviewers list in a follow-up PR. No blocker since the list wasn’t previously sorted either.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cb260d and 50dc80a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: format
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: translation-files
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: circular-deps
🔇 Additional comments (1)
OWNERS (1)

18-18: Addition LGTM — verify org membership before merge

User exists and OWNERS entry present (OWNERS: line 18). Membership check returned HTTP 403 (Resource not accessible by integration); repo permission for LiorSoffer is "read". Confirm the GitHub handle is correct and that LiorSoffer is an openshift-assisted org member (required for Prow OWNER approvals).

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ammont82, jgyselov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants