Skip to content

8362279: [vectorapi] VECTOR_OP_SUADD needs reduction support #26486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

igraves
Copy link
Member

@igraves igraves commented Jul 25, 2025

Adding SUADD to reduction support in the Vector API as it is now treated as an associative operator.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362279: [vectorapi] VECTOR_OP_SUADD needs reduction support (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26486/head:pull/26486
$ git checkout pull/26486

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26486
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26486/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26486

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26486

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26486.diff

@igraves
Copy link
Member Author

igraves commented Jul 25, 2025

@merykitty If you could review, thanks!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2025

👋 Welcome back igraves! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@igraves This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8362279: [vectorapi] VECTOR_OP_SUADD needs reduction support

Reviewed-by: jbhateja, qamai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 152 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@igraves To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

Copy link
Member

@jatin-bhateja jatin-bhateja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Ian,

LGTM, thanks for the Z3 proof https://github.com/igraves/z3proofs/blob/main/z3proofs/saturated_addition.py

I have assigned intrinsificiation JBS to myself
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8362280

Best Regards

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@merykitty merykitty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM.

@igraves
Copy link
Member Author

igraves commented Jul 30, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Going to push as commit 57d02d9.
Since your change was applied there have been 182 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

@igraves Pushed as commit 57d02d9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants