[kevinjwalls]

Hashcode needs to be reset to -1 to force its recalculation on next call, after deserialization.

The change in the readResolve() method is the fix for this problem. While here I added similar lines in other methods that may update fields (although these are noted as not supported, as they change a class supposedly "immutable").

Added a test. There is a test for serialization for this class, but I found it clearer to add the test for this specific recently discovered issue in its own test file.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8358624: ImmutableDescriptor violates equals/hashCode contract after deserialization (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Chris Plummer (@plummercj - Reviewer)
• Serguei Spitsyn (@sspitsyn - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25758/head:pull/25758
$ git checkout pull/25758

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25758
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25758/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25758

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25758

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25758.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358624: ImmutableDescriptor violates equals/hashCode contract after deserialization

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 107 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 1ca008f: 8360255: runtime/jni/checked/TestLargeUTF8Length.java fails with -XX:-CompactStrings
• cf75f1f: 8358821: patch_verified_entry causes problems, use nmethod entry barriers instead
• 5252608: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase!
• ... and 104 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ff75f763c0a91534ab593a43e2ace741d05b0ccb...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• jmx
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 02: Full - Incremental (48c46627)
• 01: Full - Incremental (6f28e857)
• 00: Full (a94b49ef)

[plummercj]

I'm not much of a serialization expert, so just asking for some clarification here. I assume when de-serialized, the initial hashcode is always 0. Why it is 0 and not by default -1. Seems this would be an issue with any de-serialized type and all would need to explicitly set to -1 as you have done in this case.

[kevinjwalls]

I'm not much of a serialization expert, so just asking for some clarification here. I assume when de-serialized, the initial hashcode is always 0. Why it is 0 and not by default -1. Seems this would be an issue with any de-serialized type and all would need to explicitly set to -1 as you have done in this case.

As a transient field the hashCode int is not restored by serialization. But why zero, and not -1 as per the field declaration?

The -1 is set by a constructor in ImmutableDescriptor.

ObjectInputStream:
"Reading an object is analogous to running the constructors of a new object. Memory is allocated for the object and initialized to zero (NULL). No-arg constructors are invoked for the non-serializable classes and then the fields of the serializable classes are restored from the stream starting with the serializable class closest to java.lang.object and finishing with the object's most specific class."

I think that is the explanation: it's all zero'd, and the constructor that would set the -1 doesn't get called.

I see another example (src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/openmbean/ArrayType.java) where we implement a hashCode member as "private transient Integer myHashCode = null; " There we check if that is null, which causes re-calculating of the hashCode on demand after deserialization. That gets default behaviour of recalculating, but uses a Java object.

This class used a primitive field, I didn't want to change much in this obscure old class.

[plummercj]

Looks good.

[kevinjwalls]

Thanks Serguei and Chris for reviewing!

[kevinjwalls]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 12196ba.
Since your change was applied there have been 129 commits pushed to the master branch:

• a471fe9: 8360539: DTLS handshakes fails due to improper cookie validation logic
• 839cede: 8357289: Break down the String constructor into smaller methods
• ecd2d83: 8359435: AArch64: add support for SB instruction to MacroAssembler::spin_wait
• ... and 126 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ff75f763c0a91534ab593a43e2ace741d05b0ccb...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 12196ba.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.