Skip to content

fix (release-automation): re-organize init-release workflow steps #12581

Open
tahmidrahman-dsi wants to merge 9 commits intorelease/1.9.13from
fix/init-release-workflow
Open

fix (release-automation): re-organize init-release workflow steps #12581
tahmidrahman-dsi wants to merge 9 commits intorelease/1.9.13from
fix/init-release-workflow

Conversation

@tahmidrahman-dsi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tahmidrahman-dsi tahmidrahman-dsi commented May 8, 2026

@tahmidrahman-dsi tahmidrahman-dsi self-assigned this May 8, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 8, 2026

Oops! Looks like you forgot to update the changelog. When updating CHANGELOG.md, please consider the following:

  • Changelog is read by country implementors who might not always be familiar with all technical details of OpenCRVS. Keep language high-level, user friendly and avoid technical references to internals.
  • Answer "What's new?", "Why was the change made?" and "Why should I care?" for each change.
  • If it's a breaking change, include a migration guide answering "What do I need to do to upgrade?".

Comment thread .github/workflows/init-release.yml Outdated
BODY=""
fi

gh pr create \
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's create a PR to develop as well

@tahmidrahman-dsi tahmidrahman-dsi changed the base branch from master to release/1.9.13 May 8, 2026 11:45
Comment on lines 146 to 174
@@ -64,7 +157,7 @@ jobs:
version: '${{ inputs.version }}'
}
})

- name: Trigger workflow in opencrvs-farajaland
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
@@ -80,58 +173,11 @@ jobs:
}
})
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use the branch that core workflow got triggered with i.e. "use workflow from"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants