-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
fix(forms): clear hidden listener fields instead of applying default value #12459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Nil20
wants to merge
8
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
ocrvs-12433
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+165
−21
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7599cc0
fix(forms): clear hidden listener fields instead of applying default …
Nil20 463447b
fix: amend form section format
Nil20 6676954
fix(ci): poll for newly dispatched e2e run instead of taking most recent
Nil20 fc32fb1
fix: use null for hidden fields
Nil20 9bbe048
chore: add test for the handling default values of hidden fields
Nil20 3ec00cf
fix(forms): revert setting null values
Nil20 c14c17b
Merge branch 'develop' into ocrvs-12433
Nil20 ba25240
Merge branch 'develop' into ocrvs-12433
Nil20 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added it because we found a stale link here: https://github.com/opencrvs/opencrvs-core/actions/runs/25014351156/job/73261242356#step:10:1
Reason: The newly triggered run hadn't appeared in the API yet after the 10-second wait. GitHub Actions has variable latency before a freshly dispatched run shows up in
listWorkflowRunsForRepo. When the list was fetched, the new run wasn't there yet, so it returned the previous run from hours ago.Fix result example: https://github.com/opencrvs/opencrvs-core/actions/runs/25017463464/job/73269507432?pr=12459#step:9:97